Bertha Lewis of ACORN DEFENDING ACORN's latest...encourage people that defaulted on their home loans and are being foreclosed on to break into the homes and squat...daring authorities to kick them out...
Here is the transcript of Stuart Varney, FOX Business network, interviewing Bertha Lewis, Executive Director of the New York branch of ACORN:
Stuart Varney: Do you think you got a right to these houses?
Bertha Lewis: I think the homeowners have a right to stay in those homes until the administrations plan can be implemented…yes I do.
Stuart Varney: They got a right to the house even though they haven’t paid their bills?
Bertha Lewis: They have been paying their bills…I think it’s a false thing to say that people haven’t been paying their bills.
Stuart Varney: No, their delinquent on their mortgages.
Bertha Lewis: Well, they maybe delinquent on their mortgages but there are people still do that.
Stuart Varney: They haven’t been paying their bills
Bertha Lewis: There are millions of millions of people who are…
Stuart Varney: Doesn’t matter, they haven’t been paying their bills.
Bertha Lewis: Being foreclosed on every day and so we have a plan in place and people need to stay there..
Stuart Varney: What right do you claim to stay in a house that you can’t afford and you cannot pay the bills and what right do you have to get my money to pay for you? I’ve read the constitution, I don’t see that right…
Bertha Lewis: Well, I don’t see the right that banks have to get 700 billion dollars to get bailed out
Stuart Varney: No, no, that’s a different thing…
Bertha Lewis: That’s all part of the same thing…
Stuart Varney: No it’s not…
Bertha Lewis: Every 13 seconds, Stuart, people are getting foreclosed on and they have the right to protect their homes and to protect their communities. It’s the most American thing you can do to protect your community.
Stuart Varney: ACORN is well known for looking at banks and saying “give us a loan,”….they don’t give you a loan so you scream racism you then invade their offices and demonstrate outside the private homes of bank executives, you embarrass the banks and you force them to give you loans on favorable terms, now…those loans cannot be repaid, you will not leave those homes and your claiming a right to stay in them and have a right to my money to make sure you stay in them, again…I come back to it Bertha, they may be be foreclosing every 13 seconds but you have absolutely no right to that house.
Bertha Lewis: Well banks don’t have a right to discriminate.
Stuart Varney: Again, your taking a parallel track you see….Where is the right?
Bertha Lewis: I wish we could force banks to our will but….
Stuart Varney: Where is the right? Where is the right to my money? You are demanding money from me.
Bertha Lewis: We’re not demanding money from you.
Stuart Varney: Yes you are.
Bertha Lewis: We’re demanding that the banks renegotiate these loans
Stuart Varney: It is taxpayer money in this plan, which you propose to bail out your people to stay in the homes they cannot afford. You are demanding my money and your saying you have a right to my money. It is no excuse to go on a parallel track and say “well the banks have no right to 700 billion dollars,” that’s not the point madam. You are demanding my money directly to your people. And that’s wrong.
Bertha Lewis: First of all these are not my people, these are millions and millions of hardworking homeowners who are paying their bills, paying….
Stuart Varney: They are not paying their bills….I can’t believe your getting away with this….they are not paying their bills.
Bertha Lewis: Well I know people who are.
Stuart Varney: They are delinquent on their mortgages that’s why they are being foreclosed on.
Bertha Lewis: They’re paying their bills, they’re paying their taxes.
Stuart Varney: They are not paying their mortgage bills and you know it.
Bertha Lewis: Yes they are.
Stuart Varney: No, if they were paying their mortgage bills they would not be foreclosed on, they would not be leaving the home….right?
Bertha Lewis: First of all, you are wrong because millions of millions of people are (ineligible), they are late on their mortgages
Stuart Varney: They are delinquent on their mortgages
Bertha Lewis: And that means late.
Stuart Varney: They have not paid their mortgage bills and you know it
Bertha Lewis: They have been foreclosed on and people need to be able to stay into their homes and so that they can take advantage of the President’s new plan.
Stuart Varney: So you invade these homes with a lot of guys. Your not going to leave, your gonna protect these people, we’re gonna stay in the home….Your a nice lady, your a gentle and a nice lady
Bertha Lewis: No I’m not…
Stuart Varney: But I put it to you….this is political thuggery.
Bertha Lewis: Well, I’m a very determined lady, I don’t think it’s political thuggery and I think it’s thuggery when you put out hard working members of home owners from their homes…..here’s the thing….
Stuart Varney: And it’s not when you invade a bank managers office so you shout racism? That’s not political thuggery?
Bertha Lewis: Well, it is true….
Stuart Varney: It is….that’s exactly what it is…
Bertha Lewis: Well you don’t want to tell a lie and a lie doesn’t make it the truth…
Stuart Varney: You are operating on taxpayer money. You’ve received…ACORN has received since 1998 thirty one million dollars of taxpayer money, three million dollars a year, you are doing this with my money.
Bertha Lewis: You want to know what we’ve done? We’ve counseled 2,300 people to stay in their homes, renegotiation their mortgages, and…here’s the thing. Every single penny we competed for and we can tell you this, if the industry had listened to us ten years ago when we said this was coming we wouldn’t be in this crisis. So now here’s what we’re gonna do.
Stuart Varney: Listened to you? You’ve invaded their offices
Bertha Lewis: No we didn’t
Stuart Varney: …you are political thugs, you embarrass banks to give them loans which they could not afford to repay and now they cannot afford to repay them and your claiming the right to my money to stay in those homes and you will have big burly guys who say “we’re not going to leave here no matter what!”
Bertha Lewis: No, we have homeowners who are protecting their homes.
Stuart Varney: Your a nice lady….come on!
Bertha Lewis: I’m a nice lady and I’m very determined lady to tell the truth and the truth is this…
Stuart Varney: You are not telling the truth…
Bertha Lewis: Here’s the thing…
Stuart Varney: Your telling me these homeowners have paid their bills and they have not…
Bertha Lewis: We cannot force anybody to do anything….here’s the thing, you know who are the thugs? The thugs are the banks, the thugs are the mortgage brokers who bilk people so they are delinquent and they deserve to be helped just like big banks and institutions are we intend to stay.
Stuart Varney: And they have not paid their mortgage bills and they have no right to those houses…that is my last word. Bertha Lewis….
Bertha Lewis: Housing is a right.
Stuart Varney: It is not a right.
Bertha Lewis: Yes it is
Stuart Varney: I’ve read the Bill of Rights, I’ve read the Constitution, no where does it say that housing is a right.
Bertha Lewis: Yes it is.
Stuart Varney: Can you show me? Which page? Which line?
Bertha Lewis: Well we have the right to the pursuit of happiness.
Stuart Varney: You have a right to a house? Where does it say that?
Bertha Lewis: If your a hard working American and you pay your taxes and you do the right thing you do have a right to protect your home.
Stuart Varney: I tell you what Bertha, we have a Constitutional lawyer in a few minutes, I’ll ask him if there is a line in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights that spells out a right to a house which you claim.
Bertha Lewis: That’s good….good.
Stuart Varney: But Bertha, we’ve run way over our allotted time..
Bertha Lewis: Have we, well you have to have me back and we will show you how many homes we have defended.
Stuart Varney: Defended? Invaded and stolen but that’s another story entirely. Thank’s Bertha.
And thanks to Stuart Varney for having the guts to tell it like it is...trouble is, is anyone listening? Let's hope so!!
DR
MAJOR H/T to Flopping Aces on this transcript
2/18/2009
REPARATION PROPOSALS FOR AFRICAN-AMERICANS ACT HR 40 IH
Here we go folks...didn't take long to get this ball rolling now did it?...and where the hell is the MSM on this bill??!!
Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act (Introduced in House) HR 40 IH
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 40 To acknowledge the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery in the United States and the 13 American colonies between 1619 and 1865 and to establish a commission to examine the institution of slavery, subsequently de jure and de facto racial and economic discrimination against African-Americans, and the impact of these forces on living African-Americans, to make recommendations to the Congress on appropriate remedies, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 6, 2009
Mr. CONYERS (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
——————————————————————————– A BILL To acknowledge the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery in the United States and the 13 American colonies between 1619 and 1865 and to establish a commission to examine the institution of slavery, subsequently de jure and de facto racial and economic discrimination against African-Americans, and the impact of these forces on living African-Americans, to make recommendations to the Congress on appropriate remedies, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the `Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. (a) Findings- The Congress finds that–
(1) approximately 4,000,000 Africans and their descendants were enslaved in the United States and colonies that became the United States from 1619 to 1865;
(2) the institution of slavery was constitutionally and statutorily sanctioned by the Government of the United States from 1789 through 1865;
(3) the slavery that flourished in the United States constituted an immoral and inhumane deprivation of Africans’ life, liberty, African citizenship rights, and cultural heritage, and denied them the fruits of their own labor; and
(4) sufficient inquiry has not been made into the effects of the institution of slavery on living African-Americans and society in the United States.
(b) Purpose- The purpose of this Act is to establish a commission to–
(1) examine the institution of slavery which existed from 1619 through 1865 within the United States and the colonies that became the United States, including the extent to which the Federal and State Governments constitutionally and statutorily supported the institution of slavery;
(2) examine de jure and de facto discrimination against freed slaves and their descendants from the end of the Civil War to the present, including economic, political, and social discrimination;
(3) examine the lingering negative effects of the institution of slavery and the discrimination described in paragraph (2) on living African-Americans and on society in the United States;
(4) recommend appropriate ways to educate the American public of the Commission’s findings;
(5) recommend appropriate remedies in consideration of the Commission’s findings on the matters described in paragraphs (1) and (2); and
(6) submit to the Congress the results of such examination, together with such recommendations.
SEC. 3. ESTABLISHMENT AND DUTIES. (a) Establishment- There is established the Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African-Americans (hereinafter in this Act referred to as the `Commission’).
(b) Duties- The Commission shall perform the following duties:
(1) Examine the institution of slavery which existed within the United States and the colonies that became the United States from 1619 through 1865. The Commission’s examination shall include an examination of–
(A) the capture and procurement of Africans;
(B) the transport of Africans to the United States and the colonies that became the United States for the purpose of enslavement, including their treatment during transport;
(C) the sale and acquisition of Africans as chattel property in interstate and instrastate commerce; and
(D) the treatment of African slaves in the colonies and the United States, including the deprivation of their freedom, exploitation of their labor, and destruction of their culture, language, religion, and families.
(2) Examine the extent to which the Federal and State governments of the United States supported the institution of slavery in constitutional and statutory provisions, including the extent to which such governments prevented, opposed, or restricted efforts of freed African slaves to repatriate to their homeland.
(3) Examine Federal and State laws that discriminated against freed African slaves and their descendants during the period between the end of the Civil War and the present.
(4) Examine other forms of discrimination in the public and private sectors against freed African slaves and their descendants during the period between the end of the Civil War and the present.
(5) Examine the lingering negative effects of the institution of slavery and the matters described in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4) on living African-Americans and on society in the United States.
(6) Recommend appropriate ways to educate the American public of the Commission’s findings.
(7) Recommend appropriate remedies in consideration of the Commission’s findings on the matters described in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4). In making such recommendations, the Commission shall address among other issues, the following questions:
(A) Whether the Government of the United States should offer a formal apology on behalf of the people of the United States for the perpetration of gross human rights violations on African slaves and their descendants.
(B) Whether African-Americans still suffer from the lingering effects of the matters described in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4).
(C) Whether, in consideration of the Commission’s findings, any form of compensation to the descendants of African slaves is warranted.
(D) If the Commission finds that such compensation is warranted, what should be the amount of compensation, what form of compensation should be awarded, and who should be eligible for such compensation.
(c) Report to Congress- The Commission shall submit a written report of its findings and recommendations to the Congress not later than the date which is one year after the date of the first meeting of the Commission held pursuant to section 4(c).
SEC. 4. MEMBERSHIP. (a) Number and Appointment- (1) The Commission shall be composed of 7 members, who shall be appointed, within 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, as follows:
(A) Three members shall be appointed by the President.
(B) Three members shall be appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
(C) One member shall be appointed by the President pro tempore of the Senate.
(2) All members of the Commission shall be persons who are especially qualified to serve on the Commission by virtue of their education, training, or experience, particularly in the field of African-American studies.
(b) Terms- The term of office for members shall be for the life of the Commission. A vacancy in the Commission shall not affect the powers of the Commission, and shall be filled in the same manner in which the original appointment was made.
(c) First Meeting- The President shall call the first meeting of the Commission within 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, or within 30 days after the date on which legislation is enacted making appropriations to carry out this Act, whichever date is later.
(d) Quorum- Four members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number may hold hearings.
(e) Chair and Vice Chair- The Commission shall elect a Chair and Vice Chair from among its members. The term of office of each shall be for the life of the Commission.
(f) Compensation- (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), each member of the Commission shall receive compensation at the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay payable for GS-18 of the General Schedule under section 5332 of title 5, United States Code, for each day, including travel time, during which he or she is engaged in the actual performance of duties vested in the Commission.
(2) A member of the Commission who is a full-time officer or employee of the United States or a Member of Congress shall receive no additional pay, allowances, or benefits by reason of his or her service to the Commission.
(3) All members of the Commission shall be reimbursed for travel, subsistence, and other necessary expenses incurred by them in the performance of their duties to the extent authorized by chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code.
SEC. 5. POWERS OF THE COMMISSION. (a) Hearings and Sessions- The Commission may, for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this Act, hold such hearings and sit and act at such times and at such places in the United States, and request the attendance and testimony of such witnesses and the production of such books, records, correspondence, memoranda, papers, and documents, as the Commission considers appropriate. The Commission may request the Attorney General to invoke the aid of an appropriate United States district court to require, by subpoena or otherwise, such attendance, testimony, or production.
(b) Powers of Subcommittees and Members- Any subcommittee or member of the Commission may, if authorized by the Commission, take any action which the Commission is authorized to take by this section.
(c) Obtaining Official Data- The Commission may acquire directly from the head of any department, agency, or instrumentality of the executive branch of the Government, available information which the Commission considers useful in the discharge of its duties. All departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the executive branch of the Government shall cooperate with the Commission with respect to such information and shall furnish all information requested by the Commission to the extent permitted by law.
SEC. 6. ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS. (a) Staff- The Commission may, without regard to section 5311(b) of title 5, United States Code, appoint and fix the compensation of such personnel as the Commission considers appropriate.
(b) Applicability of Certain Civil Service Laws- The staff of the Commission may be appointed without regard to the provisions of title 5, United States Code, governing appointments in the competitive service, and without regard to the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates, except that the compensation of any employee of the Commission may not exceed a rate equal to the annual rate of basic pay payable for GS-18 of the General Schedule under section 5332 of title 5, United States Code.
(c) Experts and Consultants- The Commission may procure the services of experts and consultants in accordance with the provisions of section 3109(b) of title 5, United States Code, but at rates for individuals not to exceed the daily equivalent of the highest rate payable under section 5332 of such title.
(d) Administrative Support Services- The Commission may enter into agreements with the Administrator of General Services for procurement of financial and administrative services necessary for the discharge of the duties of the Commission. Payment for such services shall be made by reimbursement from funds of the Commission in such amounts as may be agreed upon by the Chairman of the Commission and the Administrator.
(e) Contracts- The Commission may–
(1) procure supplies, services, and property by contract in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and to the extent or in such amounts as are provided in appropriations Acts; and
(2) enter into contracts with departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the Federal Government, State agencies, and private firms, institutions, and agencies, for the conduct of research or surveys, the preparation of reports, and other activities necessary for the discharge of the duties of the Commission, to the extent or in such amounts as are provided in appropriations Acts.
SEC. 7. TERMINATION. The Commission shall terminate 90 days after the date on which the Commission submits its report to the Congress under section 3(c).
SEC. 8. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. To carry out the provisions of this Act, there are authorized to be appropriated $8,000,000.
DR
H/T: Old Glory Radio
Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act (Introduced in House) HR 40 IH
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 40 To acknowledge the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery in the United States and the 13 American colonies between 1619 and 1865 and to establish a commission to examine the institution of slavery, subsequently de jure and de facto racial and economic discrimination against African-Americans, and the impact of these forces on living African-Americans, to make recommendations to the Congress on appropriate remedies, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 6, 2009
Mr. CONYERS (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
——————————————————————————– A BILL To acknowledge the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery in the United States and the 13 American colonies between 1619 and 1865 and to establish a commission to examine the institution of slavery, subsequently de jure and de facto racial and economic discrimination against African-Americans, and the impact of these forces on living African-Americans, to make recommendations to the Congress on appropriate remedies, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the `Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. (a) Findings- The Congress finds that–
(1) approximately 4,000,000 Africans and their descendants were enslaved in the United States and colonies that became the United States from 1619 to 1865;
(2) the institution of slavery was constitutionally and statutorily sanctioned by the Government of the United States from 1789 through 1865;
(3) the slavery that flourished in the United States constituted an immoral and inhumane deprivation of Africans’ life, liberty, African citizenship rights, and cultural heritage, and denied them the fruits of their own labor; and
(4) sufficient inquiry has not been made into the effects of the institution of slavery on living African-Americans and society in the United States.
(b) Purpose- The purpose of this Act is to establish a commission to–
(1) examine the institution of slavery which existed from 1619 through 1865 within the United States and the colonies that became the United States, including the extent to which the Federal and State Governments constitutionally and statutorily supported the institution of slavery;
(2) examine de jure and de facto discrimination against freed slaves and their descendants from the end of the Civil War to the present, including economic, political, and social discrimination;
(3) examine the lingering negative effects of the institution of slavery and the discrimination described in paragraph (2) on living African-Americans and on society in the United States;
(4) recommend appropriate ways to educate the American public of the Commission’s findings;
(5) recommend appropriate remedies in consideration of the Commission’s findings on the matters described in paragraphs (1) and (2); and
(6) submit to the Congress the results of such examination, together with such recommendations.
SEC. 3. ESTABLISHMENT AND DUTIES. (a) Establishment- There is established the Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African-Americans (hereinafter in this Act referred to as the `Commission’).
(b) Duties- The Commission shall perform the following duties:
(1) Examine the institution of slavery which existed within the United States and the colonies that became the United States from 1619 through 1865. The Commission’s examination shall include an examination of–
(A) the capture and procurement of Africans;
(B) the transport of Africans to the United States and the colonies that became the United States for the purpose of enslavement, including their treatment during transport;
(C) the sale and acquisition of Africans as chattel property in interstate and instrastate commerce; and
(D) the treatment of African slaves in the colonies and the United States, including the deprivation of their freedom, exploitation of their labor, and destruction of their culture, language, religion, and families.
(2) Examine the extent to which the Federal and State governments of the United States supported the institution of slavery in constitutional and statutory provisions, including the extent to which such governments prevented, opposed, or restricted efforts of freed African slaves to repatriate to their homeland.
(3) Examine Federal and State laws that discriminated against freed African slaves and their descendants during the period between the end of the Civil War and the present.
(4) Examine other forms of discrimination in the public and private sectors against freed African slaves and their descendants during the period between the end of the Civil War and the present.
(5) Examine the lingering negative effects of the institution of slavery and the matters described in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4) on living African-Americans and on society in the United States.
(6) Recommend appropriate ways to educate the American public of the Commission’s findings.
(7) Recommend appropriate remedies in consideration of the Commission’s findings on the matters described in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4). In making such recommendations, the Commission shall address among other issues, the following questions:
(A) Whether the Government of the United States should offer a formal apology on behalf of the people of the United States for the perpetration of gross human rights violations on African slaves and their descendants.
(B) Whether African-Americans still suffer from the lingering effects of the matters described in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4).
(C) Whether, in consideration of the Commission’s findings, any form of compensation to the descendants of African slaves is warranted.
(D) If the Commission finds that such compensation is warranted, what should be the amount of compensation, what form of compensation should be awarded, and who should be eligible for such compensation.
(c) Report to Congress- The Commission shall submit a written report of its findings and recommendations to the Congress not later than the date which is one year after the date of the first meeting of the Commission held pursuant to section 4(c).
SEC. 4. MEMBERSHIP. (a) Number and Appointment- (1) The Commission shall be composed of 7 members, who shall be appointed, within 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, as follows:
(A) Three members shall be appointed by the President.
(B) Three members shall be appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
(C) One member shall be appointed by the President pro tempore of the Senate.
(2) All members of the Commission shall be persons who are especially qualified to serve on the Commission by virtue of their education, training, or experience, particularly in the field of African-American studies.
(b) Terms- The term of office for members shall be for the life of the Commission. A vacancy in the Commission shall not affect the powers of the Commission, and shall be filled in the same manner in which the original appointment was made.
(c) First Meeting- The President shall call the first meeting of the Commission within 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, or within 30 days after the date on which legislation is enacted making appropriations to carry out this Act, whichever date is later.
(d) Quorum- Four members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number may hold hearings.
(e) Chair and Vice Chair- The Commission shall elect a Chair and Vice Chair from among its members. The term of office of each shall be for the life of the Commission.
(f) Compensation- (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), each member of the Commission shall receive compensation at the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay payable for GS-18 of the General Schedule under section 5332 of title 5, United States Code, for each day, including travel time, during which he or she is engaged in the actual performance of duties vested in the Commission.
(2) A member of the Commission who is a full-time officer or employee of the United States or a Member of Congress shall receive no additional pay, allowances, or benefits by reason of his or her service to the Commission.
(3) All members of the Commission shall be reimbursed for travel, subsistence, and other necessary expenses incurred by them in the performance of their duties to the extent authorized by chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code.
SEC. 5. POWERS OF THE COMMISSION. (a) Hearings and Sessions- The Commission may, for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this Act, hold such hearings and sit and act at such times and at such places in the United States, and request the attendance and testimony of such witnesses and the production of such books, records, correspondence, memoranda, papers, and documents, as the Commission considers appropriate. The Commission may request the Attorney General to invoke the aid of an appropriate United States district court to require, by subpoena or otherwise, such attendance, testimony, or production.
(b) Powers of Subcommittees and Members- Any subcommittee or member of the Commission may, if authorized by the Commission, take any action which the Commission is authorized to take by this section.
(c) Obtaining Official Data- The Commission may acquire directly from the head of any department, agency, or instrumentality of the executive branch of the Government, available information which the Commission considers useful in the discharge of its duties. All departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the executive branch of the Government shall cooperate with the Commission with respect to such information and shall furnish all information requested by the Commission to the extent permitted by law.
SEC. 6. ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS. (a) Staff- The Commission may, without regard to section 5311(b) of title 5, United States Code, appoint and fix the compensation of such personnel as the Commission considers appropriate.
(b) Applicability of Certain Civil Service Laws- The staff of the Commission may be appointed without regard to the provisions of title 5, United States Code, governing appointments in the competitive service, and without regard to the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates, except that the compensation of any employee of the Commission may not exceed a rate equal to the annual rate of basic pay payable for GS-18 of the General Schedule under section 5332 of title 5, United States Code.
(c) Experts and Consultants- The Commission may procure the services of experts and consultants in accordance with the provisions of section 3109(b) of title 5, United States Code, but at rates for individuals not to exceed the daily equivalent of the highest rate payable under section 5332 of such title.
(d) Administrative Support Services- The Commission may enter into agreements with the Administrator of General Services for procurement of financial and administrative services necessary for the discharge of the duties of the Commission. Payment for such services shall be made by reimbursement from funds of the Commission in such amounts as may be agreed upon by the Chairman of the Commission and the Administrator.
(e) Contracts- The Commission may–
(1) procure supplies, services, and property by contract in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and to the extent or in such amounts as are provided in appropriations Acts; and
(2) enter into contracts with departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the Federal Government, State agencies, and private firms, institutions, and agencies, for the conduct of research or surveys, the preparation of reports, and other activities necessary for the discharge of the duties of the Commission, to the extent or in such amounts as are provided in appropriations Acts.
SEC. 7. TERMINATION. The Commission shall terminate 90 days after the date on which the Commission submits its report to the Congress under section 3(c).
SEC. 8. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. To carry out the provisions of this Act, there are authorized to be appropriated $8,000,000.
DR
H/T: Old Glory Radio
2/14/2009
NANCY PELOSI BROKE HER PROMISE - NOT ONE MEMBER OF CONGRESS ABLE TO READ STIMULUS BILL PRIOR TO VOTING ON IT!
NANCY PELOSI PROMISED CONGRESS AND AMERICA THE OPPORTUNITY TO READ THE 1,100+ PAGE STIMULUS BILL AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONGRESS VOTING ON IT....
AND WHAT DID PELOSI DO?
SHE BROKE HER PROMISE!
A SCANNED PICTURE OF THE BILL WAS PUT ONLINE LESS THAN 12 HOURS BEFORE THE VOTE...WHICH MEANS THAT EVEN IF SOMEONE STAYED UP ALL NIGHT, NOTHING COULD BE SEARCHED WITHIN THE DOCUMENT, SOMEONE HAD TO PRINT IT AND READ - OR TRY TO READ - THE BILL...
NANCY PELOSI AND HARRY REID NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM CONGRESS...NOW!
DR
AND WHAT DID PELOSI DO?
SHE BROKE HER PROMISE!
A SCANNED PICTURE OF THE BILL WAS PUT ONLINE LESS THAN 12 HOURS BEFORE THE VOTE...WHICH MEANS THAT EVEN IF SOMEONE STAYED UP ALL NIGHT, NOTHING COULD BE SEARCHED WITHIN THE DOCUMENT, SOMEONE HAD TO PRINT IT AND READ - OR TRY TO READ - THE BILL...
NANCY PELOSI AND HARRY REID NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM CONGRESS...NOW!
DR
2/12/2009
"WE'RE NOT RICH...YET"
A real call by a woman to a bank or finance company that was going to repossess their car...the reason?...for NON-PAYMENT
This is real audacity...not the kind that most people THOUGHT Barack Obama was talking about...
THIS apparently is what Barack Obama was talking about...
TAKING the money from the people that work hard and pay their bills AND taxes...and GIVING their money to the people that don't work and pay taxes...
Elections have consequences...and this is only the beginning...
DR
This is real audacity...not the kind that most people THOUGHT Barack Obama was talking about...
THIS apparently is what Barack Obama was talking about...
TAKING the money from the people that work hard and pay their bills AND taxes...and GIVING their money to the people that don't work and pay taxes...
Elections have consequences...and this is only the beginning...
DR
2/10/2009
OBAMA CLAIMS THAT NO ECONOMIST DISAGREES WITH HIS STIMULUS PLAN
Thanks to the Cato Institute for putting together a statement that disputes Obama's claim that "everyone agrees" with his (Obama's) stimulus plan...
The American Spectator reports: Obama and other Democrats have repeatedly invoked the idea of an expert consensus in favor of the Pelosi plan. In his Jan. 3 weekly radio address as president-elect, Obama said that "economists from across the political spectrum agree" in support of the plan, and in a Jan. 9 press conference, he declared: "There is no disagreement that we need action by our government -- a recovery plan that will help to jump-start the economy."
Tired of hearing this insipid "everybody agrees" argument, the libertarian Cato Institute produced an open-letter response ad (pdf) featuring the bold headline: "With all due respect, Mr. President, that's not true." The open letter has now been signed by more than 200 economists, and I overheard a top Cato official last week tell a supporter that the institute plans to continue its ad campaign against the phony Keynesian consensus. (my emphasis)
Obama and his handlers are doing a good job of trying to brainwash the American public into buying his socialist, nanny-government programs...we need to keep digging and objecting...probably every day for the next four years...but I know we are up to it!
DR
The American Spectator reports: Obama and other Democrats have repeatedly invoked the idea of an expert consensus in favor of the Pelosi plan. In his Jan. 3 weekly radio address as president-elect, Obama said that "economists from across the political spectrum agree" in support of the plan, and in a Jan. 9 press conference, he declared: "There is no disagreement that we need action by our government -- a recovery plan that will help to jump-start the economy."
Tired of hearing this insipid "everybody agrees" argument, the libertarian Cato Institute produced an open-letter response ad (pdf) featuring the bold headline: "With all due respect, Mr. President, that's not true." The open letter has now been signed by more than 200 economists, and I overheard a top Cato official last week tell a supporter that the institute plans to continue its ad campaign against the phony Keynesian consensus. (my emphasis)
Obama and his handlers are doing a good job of trying to brainwash the American public into buying his socialist, nanny-government programs...we need to keep digging and objecting...probably every day for the next four years...but I know we are up to it!
DR
OBAMA: THERE ARE THOSE THAT WANT TO DO NOTHING
WHO??
WHO "WANTS TO DO NOTHING"???
WE WANT NAMES, OBAMA, NOT INNUENDOS AND CLOAKED ACCUSATIONS!!!
"As I said, the one concern I've got on the stimulus package, in terms of the debate and listening to some of what's been said in Congress, is that there seems to be a set of folks who -- I don't doubt their sincerity -- who just believe that we should do nothing."
I HAVE NEVER HEARD ANYONE IN CONGRESS STATE THAT THEY WANT TO DO NOTHING!
REPUBLICANS ARE SIMPLY SAYING THAT THIS BILL IS NOT THE BILL TO GET US OUT OF THE "OBAMA CRISIS"...
DR
WHO "WANTS TO DO NOTHING"???
WE WANT NAMES, OBAMA, NOT INNUENDOS AND CLOAKED ACCUSATIONS!!!
"As I said, the one concern I've got on the stimulus package, in terms of the debate and listening to some of what's been said in Congress, is that there seems to be a set of folks who -- I don't doubt their sincerity -- who just believe that we should do nothing."
I HAVE NEVER HEARD ANYONE IN CONGRESS STATE THAT THEY WANT TO DO NOTHING!
REPUBLICANS ARE SIMPLY SAYING THAT THIS BILL IS NOT THE BILL TO GET US OUT OF THE "OBAMA CRISIS"...
DR
OBAMA'S BILL: SENIORS SHOULD BE MORE ACCEPTING OF THE CONDITIONS THAT COME WITH AGE INSTEAD OF TREATING THEM
BE AFRAID...BE VERY AFRAID!
Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt.
Defenders of the system say that individuals benefit in younger years and sacrifice later.
The stimulus bill will affect every part of health care, from medical and nursing education, to how patients are treated and how much hospitals get paid. The bill allocates more funding for this bureaucracy than for the Army, Navy, Marines, and Air Force combined (90-92, 174-177, 181).
Hiding health legislation in a stimulus bill is intentional. Daschle supported the Clinton administration’s health-care overhaul in 1994, and attributed its failure to debate and delay. A year ago, Daschle wrote that the next president should act quickly before critics mount an opposition. “If that means attaching a health-care plan to the federal budget, so be it,” he said. “The issue is too important to be stalled by Senate protocol.”
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!!
DR
Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt.
Defenders of the system say that individuals benefit in younger years and sacrifice later.
The stimulus bill will affect every part of health care, from medical and nursing education, to how patients are treated and how much hospitals get paid. The bill allocates more funding for this bureaucracy than for the Army, Navy, Marines, and Air Force combined (90-92, 174-177, 181).
Hiding health legislation in a stimulus bill is intentional. Daschle supported the Clinton administration’s health-care overhaul in 1994, and attributed its failure to debate and delay. A year ago, Daschle wrote that the next president should act quickly before critics mount an opposition. “If that means attaching a health-care plan to the federal budget, so be it,” he said. “The issue is too important to be stalled by Senate protocol.”
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!!
DR
1/29/2009
SAUL ALINSKY'S RULES FOR RADICALS
EVER WONDER WHAT THOSE RULES ARE?
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS A STUDENT OF SAUL ALINSKY...OBAMA OPERATES UNDER THESE RULES, AND WHEN YOU READ THEM YOU WILL RECOGNIZE SOME OF OBAMA'S TACTICS:
RULE 1: "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have." Power is derived from 2 main sources - money and people. "Have-Nots" must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
RULE 2: "Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don't address the "real" issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
RULE 3: "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
RULE 4: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity's very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
RULE 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
RULE 6: "A good tactic is one your people enjoy." They'll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They're doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid "un-fun" activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
RULE 7: "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." Don't become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
RULE 8: "Keep the pressure on. Never let up." Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
RULE 9: "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself." Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists' minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.) ****NOTE: THIS IS WHAT OBAMA IS DOING NOW TO TRY TO FORCE US TO PASS MORE MONEY AND POWER TO HIM VIA "STIMULUS" BILL
RULE 10: "If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive." Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management's wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
RULE 11: "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative." Never let the enemy score points because you're caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.) ***NOTE: THIS IS THE ONE OBAMA IS USING ON RUSH LIMBAUGH
DR
HT: Craig Miyamoto
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS A STUDENT OF SAUL ALINSKY...OBAMA OPERATES UNDER THESE RULES, AND WHEN YOU READ THEM YOU WILL RECOGNIZE SOME OF OBAMA'S TACTICS:
RULE 1: "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have." Power is derived from 2 main sources - money and people. "Have-Nots" must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
RULE 2: "Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don't address the "real" issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
RULE 3: "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
RULE 4: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity's very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
RULE 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
RULE 6: "A good tactic is one your people enjoy." They'll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They're doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid "un-fun" activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
RULE 7: "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." Don't become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
RULE 8: "Keep the pressure on. Never let up." Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
RULE 9: "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself." Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists' minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.) ****NOTE: THIS IS WHAT OBAMA IS DOING NOW TO TRY TO FORCE US TO PASS MORE MONEY AND POWER TO HIM VIA "STIMULUS" BILL
RULE 10: "If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive." Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management's wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
RULE 11: "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative." Never let the enemy score points because you're caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.) ***NOTE: THIS IS THE ONE OBAMA IS USING ON RUSH LIMBAUGH
DR
HT: Craig Miyamoto
12/31/2008
HITCHENS FLIPS OFF MAHER'S MORONS
Don't always agree with Christopher Hitchens, but his appearance on Bill Maher's show is great to watch... (I know! Maher is a pig, but I wasn't watching the show, found this elsewhere on the net..)
At the end of the clip, Maher resorts to bringing up the 'Clinton cigar'...he is the biggest moron of all...
DR
At the end of the clip, Maher resorts to bringing up the 'Clinton cigar'...he is the biggest moron of all...
DR
11/09/2008
WHAT IF...
I want to play a little game…see if you agree…
WHAT IF:
- ACORN was registering fake Republican voters
- John McCain had his birth records sealed
- John McCain served on a board with a terrorist
- Two white men were standing outside a polling place with nightsticks
- John McCain’s preacher for over 20 years screamed “God DAMN America!” from the pulpit
- Two white men told poll workers “You might as well go home, a white man is going to be elected no matter what”
- John McCain bought a home for $300,000 less than the market price from a convicted criminal
- John McCain had fundraisers thrown for him in Tony Rezko’s home (a convicted criminal), Bill Ayer’s home (a known terrorist), Rashid Khalidi’s home (an open supporter of Palistine and has spoken of Israel’s demise)
- John McCain donated $800,000 to ACORN, the same ACORN that is under investigation for voter fraud
- John McCain accepted millions of dollars from anonymous donors
- John McCain accepted millions of dollars from foreign donors
- 97% of white voters voted for John McCain because he is white
- John McCain said he will disarm America
- One of John McCain’s early mentors was a known communist, namely Frank Marshall Davis
- John McCain had voted 3 times against aid for infants born out of a botched abortion, saying that if he did it would “cause the mother to rethink her decision”
- John McCain would accuse anyone questioning him of being racist
- A citizen's personal information was compromised by a McCain supporter and that citizen's personal information was sent out to all the news media just because that citizen had the audacity to ask John McCain a question about the impact of McCain's proposed tax plan on that citizen
This list could go on and on and on…but WHAT IF these things had happened?
Do you THINK we would have elected John McCain president in SPITE of all of these??
DR
WHAT IF:
- ACORN was registering fake Republican voters
- John McCain had his birth records sealed
- John McCain served on a board with a terrorist
- Two white men were standing outside a polling place with nightsticks
- John McCain’s preacher for over 20 years screamed “God DAMN America!” from the pulpit
- Two white men told poll workers “You might as well go home, a white man is going to be elected no matter what”
- John McCain bought a home for $300,000 less than the market price from a convicted criminal
- John McCain had fundraisers thrown for him in Tony Rezko’s home (a convicted criminal), Bill Ayer’s home (a known terrorist), Rashid Khalidi’s home (an open supporter of Palistine and has spoken of Israel’s demise)
- John McCain donated $800,000 to ACORN, the same ACORN that is under investigation for voter fraud
- John McCain accepted millions of dollars from anonymous donors
- John McCain accepted millions of dollars from foreign donors
- 97% of white voters voted for John McCain because he is white
- John McCain said he will disarm America
- One of John McCain’s early mentors was a known communist, namely Frank Marshall Davis
- John McCain had voted 3 times against aid for infants born out of a botched abortion, saying that if he did it would “cause the mother to rethink her decision”
- John McCain would accuse anyone questioning him of being racist
- A citizen's personal information was compromised by a McCain supporter and that citizen's personal information was sent out to all the news media just because that citizen had the audacity to ask John McCain a question about the impact of McCain's proposed tax plan on that citizen
This list could go on and on and on…but WHAT IF these things had happened?
Do you THINK we would have elected John McCain president in SPITE of all of these??
DR
11/05/2008
I BLAME THE MEDIA
You could find many to blame for last night's loss...but the truth is, we lost...America lost...the citizens of this great country just elected a man to the office of president based not on experience but on emotion...
THAT is historical...
Barack Obama will now get all of our national security information...is he qualified for that?
Someone said that Barack Obama wouldn't even pass a background check if he wanted to go into the FBI or CIA...is he qualified to have his finger on the 'red button'...?
There are many, many things we do NOT know about Barack Obama...and now he is going to be the leader of the free world...
Free world for how long?
My God...what has just happened?
I am going to take a few days off and away from politics, but when I get back it will be time to go to work in earnest...
This is not something that conservatives will lament and scream "I'm moving to Canada!" like liberals did in 2000 and 2004...oh, and when did just one of them ever follow through on that promise?
As sick and tired as we all are of hearing political ads 24/7, this is not a time to just accept the outcome of this election...
We need to regroup and follow through on everything that the main stream media shoved under the rug...
Like just *WHO* gave donations to Barack Obama's campaign...WHO??
And *WHO* was really responsible for the housing/economic crisis that resulted in the $700 BILLION DOLLAR BAILOUT??
Now is not the time to sink into despair...now is the time take all of this very seriously and hold accountable the people that knowingly broke laws and put this country at risk...
But for the moment, I am going to take 5...
DR
THAT is historical...
Barack Obama will now get all of our national security information...is he qualified for that?
Someone said that Barack Obama wouldn't even pass a background check if he wanted to go into the FBI or CIA...is he qualified to have his finger on the 'red button'...?
There are many, many things we do NOT know about Barack Obama...and now he is going to be the leader of the free world...
Free world for how long?
My God...what has just happened?
I am going to take a few days off and away from politics, but when I get back it will be time to go to work in earnest...
This is not something that conservatives will lament and scream "I'm moving to Canada!" like liberals did in 2000 and 2004...oh, and when did just one of them ever follow through on that promise?
As sick and tired as we all are of hearing political ads 24/7, this is not a time to just accept the outcome of this election...
We need to regroup and follow through on everything that the main stream media shoved under the rug...
Like just *WHO* gave donations to Barack Obama's campaign...WHO??
And *WHO* was really responsible for the housing/economic crisis that resulted in the $700 BILLION DOLLAR BAILOUT??
Now is not the time to sink into despair...now is the time take all of this very seriously and hold accountable the people that knowingly broke laws and put this country at risk...
But for the moment, I am going to take 5...
DR
11/04/2008
10/27/2008
JOE BIDEN: "I DON'T KNOW WHO IS WRITING YOUR QUESTIONS!"
Joe Biden finally...FINALLY...gets a "tough" interview, and he turns around and attacks the reporter...I found the interview:
WFTV’s Barbara West, an Orland anchorwoman, grilled Biden on everything from his running mate’s connections to Acorn to his statement that Obama would be “tested” by an international crisis and may make decisions that don’t immediately seem like the right ones — and even quoted Karl Marx to ask how Obama would be any different from the Communist founder who favored redistributing wealth to society’s underclass.
“Is this a joke?” Biden asked after the Marxism line. “Is that a real question?” West assured him that it was.
West later asked if Obama wanted to make the United States a socialist country “like Sweden,” and whether Biden’s “tested” remarks meant that Obama’s leadership would result in the United States losing it’s status as the world’s lone superpower.
“I don’t know who’s writing your questions,” Biden replied.
One point: Biden stated that the Obama campaign had "never given money to ACORN"...which is a lie...just because the money was given to Citizen Services Inc. (CSI) and not to ACORN directly, it is a well known fact that CSI is a subsidiary corporation of ACORN...
The Obama campaign, knowing the impact of funneling the money to ACORN, hid the contribution...or tried to...which is a criminal offense, imo...
but I digress...
...unfortunately, Breitbart tv has removed it but they have a writeup on the Obama campaign's cancellation of a subsequent interview:
After this interview the Obama campaign canceled a scheduled interview with Jill Biden: "There's nothing wrong with tough questions, but reporters have the very important job of sharing the truth with the public -- not misleading the American people with false information. Senator Biden handled the interview well; however, the anchor was completely unprofessional. Senator Biden's wife is not running for elected office, and there are many other stations in the Orlando television market that would gladly conduct a respectful and factual interview with her." "This cancellation is non-negotiable, and further opportunities for your station to interview with this campaign are unlikely, at best for the duration of the remaining days until the election."
After all the horrible, shocking, appalling things that have been written and said about Governor Palin, Biden's reaction is disturbing...
The American people DESERVE to know the truth about Barack Obama...questions about what Barack Obama intends to do if he is elected are completely IN LINE and justifiable!
DR
WFTV’s Barbara West, an Orland anchorwoman, grilled Biden on everything from his running mate’s connections to Acorn to his statement that Obama would be “tested” by an international crisis and may make decisions that don’t immediately seem like the right ones — and even quoted Karl Marx to ask how Obama would be any different from the Communist founder who favored redistributing wealth to society’s underclass.
“Is this a joke?” Biden asked after the Marxism line. “Is that a real question?” West assured him that it was.
West later asked if Obama wanted to make the United States a socialist country “like Sweden,” and whether Biden’s “tested” remarks meant that Obama’s leadership would result in the United States losing it’s status as the world’s lone superpower.
“I don’t know who’s writing your questions,” Biden replied.
One point: Biden stated that the Obama campaign had "never given money to ACORN"...which is a lie...just because the money was given to Citizen Services Inc. (CSI) and not to ACORN directly, it is a well known fact that CSI is a subsidiary corporation of ACORN...
The Obama campaign, knowing the impact of funneling the money to ACORN, hid the contribution...or tried to...which is a criminal offense, imo...
but I digress...
...unfortunately, Breitbart tv has removed it but they have a writeup on the Obama campaign's cancellation of a subsequent interview:
After this interview the Obama campaign canceled a scheduled interview with Jill Biden: "There's nothing wrong with tough questions, but reporters have the very important job of sharing the truth with the public -- not misleading the American people with false information. Senator Biden handled the interview well; however, the anchor was completely unprofessional. Senator Biden's wife is not running for elected office, and there are many other stations in the Orlando television market that would gladly conduct a respectful and factual interview with her." "This cancellation is non-negotiable, and further opportunities for your station to interview with this campaign are unlikely, at best for the duration of the remaining days until the election."
After all the horrible, shocking, appalling things that have been written and said about Governor Palin, Biden's reaction is disturbing...
The American people DESERVE to know the truth about Barack Obama...questions about what Barack Obama intends to do if he is elected are completely IN LINE and justifiable!
DR
10/22/2008
DEMOCRAT ORSON SCOTT CARD: JOURNALISM IS PUBLIC RELATIONS MACHINE FOR DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Orson Scott Card is a democrat
Orson Scott Card is a journalist
This must have been very difficult for Mr. Card to write, but Orson Scott Card calls it like it is:
Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights?
By Orson Scott Card
Editor's note: Orson Scott Card is a Democrat and a newspaper columnist, and in this opinion piece he takes on both while lamenting the current state of journalism.
An open letter to the local daily paper — almost every local daily paper in America:
I remember reading All the President's Men and thinking: That's journalism. You do what it takes to get the truth and you lay it before the public, because the public has a right to know.
This housing crisis didn't come out of nowhere. It was not a vague emanation of the evil Bush administration.
It was a direct result of the political decision, back in the late 1990s, to loosen the rules of lending so that home loans would be more accessible to poor people. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were authorized to approve risky loans.
What is a risky loan? It's a loan that the recipient is likely not to be able to repay.
The goal of this rule change was to help the poor — which especially would help members of minority groups. But how does it help these people to give them a loan that they can't repay? They get into a house, yes, but when they can't make the payments, they lose the house — along with their credit rating.
They end up worse off than before.
This was completely foreseeable and in fact many people did foresee it. One political party, in Congress and in the executive branch, tried repeatedly to tighten up the rules. The other party blocked every such attempt and tried to loosen them.
Furthermore, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were making political contributions to the very members of Congress who were allowing them to make irresponsible loans. (Though why quasi-federal agencies were allowed to do so baffles me. It's as if the Pentagon were allowed to contribute to the political campaigns of Congressmen who support increasing their budget.)
Isn't there a story here? Doesn't journalism require that you who produce our daily paper tell the truth about who brought us to a position where the only way to keep confidence in our economy was a $700 billion bailout? Aren't you supposed to follow the money and see which politicians were benefiting personally from the deregulation of mortgage lending?
I have no doubt that if these facts had pointed to the Republican Party or to John McCain as the guilty parties, you would be treating it as a vast scandal. "Housing-gate," no doubt. Or "Fannie-gate."
Instead, it was Senator Christopher Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank, both Democrats, who denied that there were any problems, who refused Bush administration requests to set up a regulatory agency to watch over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and who were still pushing for these agencies to go even further in promoting sub-prime mortgage loans almost up to the minute they failed.
As Thomas Sowell points out in a TownHall.com essay entitled "Do Facts Matter?" ( http://snipurl.com/457townhall_com] ): "Alan Greenspan warned them four years ago. So did the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers to the President. So did Bush's Secretary of the Treasury."
These are facts. This financial crisis was completely preventable. The party that blocked any attempt to prevent it was ... the Democratic Party. The party that tried to prevent it was ... the Republican Party.
Yet when Nancy Pelosi accused the Bush administration and Republican deregulation of causing the crisis, you in the press did not hold her to account for her lie. Instead, you criticized Republicans who took offense at this lie and refused to vote for the bailout!
What? It's not the liar, but the victims of the lie who are to blame?
Now let's follow the money ... right to the presidential candidate who is the number-two recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae.
And after Freddie Raines, the CEO of Fannie Mae who made $90 million while running it into the ground, was fired for his incompetence, one presidential candidate's campaign actually consulted him for advice on housing.
If that presidential candidate had been John McCain, you would have called it a major scandal and we would be getting stories in your paper every day about how incompetent and corrupt he was.
But instead, that candidate was Barack Obama, and so you have buried this story, and when the McCain campaign dared to call Raines an "adviser" to the Obama campaign — because that campaign had sought his advice — you actually let Obama's people get away with accusing McCain of lying, merely because Raines wasn't listed as an official adviser to the Obama campaign.
You would never tolerate such weasely nit-picking from a Republican.
If you who produce our local daily paper actually had any principles, you would be pounding this story, because the prosperity of all Americans was put at risk by the foolish, short-sighted, politically selfish, and possibly corrupt actions of leading Democrats, including Obama.
If you who produce our local daily paper had any personal honor, you would find it unbearable to let the American people believe that somehow Republicans were to blame for this crisis.
There are precedents. Even though President Bush and his administration never said that Iraq sponsored or was linked to 9/11, you could not stand the fact that Americans had that misapprehension — so you pounded us with the fact that there was no such link. (Along the way, you created the false impression that Bush had lied to them and said that there was a connection.)
If you had any principles, then surely right now, when the American people are set to blame President Bush and John McCain for a crisis they tried to prevent, and are actually shifting to approve of Barack Obama because of a crisis he helped cause, you would be laboring at least as hard to correct that false impression.
Your job, as journalists, is to tell the truth. That's what you claim you do, when you accept people's money to buy or subscribe to your paper. (my emphasis)
But right now, you are consenting to or actively promoting a big fat lie — that the housing crisis should somehow be blamed on Bush, McCain, and the Republicans. You have trained the American people to blame everything bad — even bad weather — on Bush, and they are responding as you have taught them to.
If you had any personal honor, each reporter and editor would be insisting on telling the truth — even if it hurts the election chances of your favorite candidate.
Because that's what honorable people do. Honest people tell the truth even when they don't like the probable consequences. That's what honesty means . That's how trust is earned.
Barack Obama is just another politician, and not a very wise one. He has revealed his ignorance and naivete time after time — and you have swept it under the rug, treated it as nothing.
Meanwhile, you have participated in the borking of Sarah Palin, reporting savage attacks on her for the pregnancy of her unmarried daughter — while you ignored the story of John Edwards's own adultery for many months.
So I ask you now: Do you have any standards at all? Do you even know what honesty means?
Is getting people to vote for Barack Obama so important that you will throw away everything that journalism is supposed to stand for?
You might want to remember the way the National Organization of Women threw away their integrity by supporting Bill Clinton despite his well-known pattern of sexual exploitation of powerless women. Who listens to NOW anymore? We know they stand for nothing; they have no principles.
That's where you are right now.
It's not too late. You know that if the situation were reversed, and the truth would damage McCain and help Obama, you would be moving heaven and earth to get the true story out there.
If you want to redeem your honor, you will swallow hard and make a list of all the stories you would print if it were McCain who had been getting money from Fannie Mae, McCain whose campaign had consulted with its discredited former CEO, McCain who had voted against tightening its lending practices.
Then you will print them, even though every one of those true stories will point the finger of blame at the reckless Democratic Party, which put our nation's prosperity at risk so they could feel good about helping the poor, and lay a fair share of the blame at Obama's door.
You will also tell the truth about John McCain: that he tried, as a Senator, to do what it took to prevent this crisis. You will tell the truth about President Bush: that his administration tried more than once to get Congress to regulate lending in a responsible way.
This was a Congress-caused crisis, beginning during the Clinton administration, with Democrats leading the way into the crisis and blocking every effort to get out of it in a timely fashion.
If you at our local daily newspaper continue to let Americans believe — and vote as if — President Bush and the Republicans caused the crisis, then you are joining in that lie.
If you do not tell the truth about the Democrats — including Barack Obama — and do so with the same energy you would use if the miscreants were Republicans — then you are not journalists by any standard.
You're just the public relations machine of the Democratic Party, and it's time you were all fired and real journalists brought in, so that we can actually have a news paper in our city.
This article first appeared in The Rhinoceros Times of Greensboro, North Carolina, and is used here by permission.
Kudos Mr. Card...
Bravo!
DR
H/T: Powerline blog
Orson Scott Card is a journalist
This must have been very difficult for Mr. Card to write, but Orson Scott Card calls it like it is:
Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights?
By Orson Scott Card
Editor's note: Orson Scott Card is a Democrat and a newspaper columnist, and in this opinion piece he takes on both while lamenting the current state of journalism.
An open letter to the local daily paper — almost every local daily paper in America:
I remember reading All the President's Men and thinking: That's journalism. You do what it takes to get the truth and you lay it before the public, because the public has a right to know.
This housing crisis didn't come out of nowhere. It was not a vague emanation of the evil Bush administration.
It was a direct result of the political decision, back in the late 1990s, to loosen the rules of lending so that home loans would be more accessible to poor people. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were authorized to approve risky loans.
What is a risky loan? It's a loan that the recipient is likely not to be able to repay.
The goal of this rule change was to help the poor — which especially would help members of minority groups. But how does it help these people to give them a loan that they can't repay? They get into a house, yes, but when they can't make the payments, they lose the house — along with their credit rating.
They end up worse off than before.
This was completely foreseeable and in fact many people did foresee it. One political party, in Congress and in the executive branch, tried repeatedly to tighten up the rules. The other party blocked every such attempt and tried to loosen them.
Furthermore, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were making political contributions to the very members of Congress who were allowing them to make irresponsible loans. (Though why quasi-federal agencies were allowed to do so baffles me. It's as if the Pentagon were allowed to contribute to the political campaigns of Congressmen who support increasing their budget.)
Isn't there a story here? Doesn't journalism require that you who produce our daily paper tell the truth about who brought us to a position where the only way to keep confidence in our economy was a $700 billion bailout? Aren't you supposed to follow the money and see which politicians were benefiting personally from the deregulation of mortgage lending?
I have no doubt that if these facts had pointed to the Republican Party or to John McCain as the guilty parties, you would be treating it as a vast scandal. "Housing-gate," no doubt. Or "Fannie-gate."
Instead, it was Senator Christopher Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank, both Democrats, who denied that there were any problems, who refused Bush administration requests to set up a regulatory agency to watch over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and who were still pushing for these agencies to go even further in promoting sub-prime mortgage loans almost up to the minute they failed.
As Thomas Sowell points out in a TownHall.com essay entitled "Do Facts Matter?" ( http://snipurl.com/457townhall_com] ): "Alan Greenspan warned them four years ago. So did the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers to the President. So did Bush's Secretary of the Treasury."
These are facts. This financial crisis was completely preventable. The party that blocked any attempt to prevent it was ... the Democratic Party. The party that tried to prevent it was ... the Republican Party.
Yet when Nancy Pelosi accused the Bush administration and Republican deregulation of causing the crisis, you in the press did not hold her to account for her lie. Instead, you criticized Republicans who took offense at this lie and refused to vote for the bailout!
What? It's not the liar, but the victims of the lie who are to blame?
Now let's follow the money ... right to the presidential candidate who is the number-two recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae.
And after Freddie Raines, the CEO of Fannie Mae who made $90 million while running it into the ground, was fired for his incompetence, one presidential candidate's campaign actually consulted him for advice on housing.
If that presidential candidate had been John McCain, you would have called it a major scandal and we would be getting stories in your paper every day about how incompetent and corrupt he was.
But instead, that candidate was Barack Obama, and so you have buried this story, and when the McCain campaign dared to call Raines an "adviser" to the Obama campaign — because that campaign had sought his advice — you actually let Obama's people get away with accusing McCain of lying, merely because Raines wasn't listed as an official adviser to the Obama campaign.
You would never tolerate such weasely nit-picking from a Republican.
If you who produce our local daily paper actually had any principles, you would be pounding this story, because the prosperity of all Americans was put at risk by the foolish, short-sighted, politically selfish, and possibly corrupt actions of leading Democrats, including Obama.
If you who produce our local daily paper had any personal honor, you would find it unbearable to let the American people believe that somehow Republicans were to blame for this crisis.
There are precedents. Even though President Bush and his administration never said that Iraq sponsored or was linked to 9/11, you could not stand the fact that Americans had that misapprehension — so you pounded us with the fact that there was no such link. (Along the way, you created the false impression that Bush had lied to them and said that there was a connection.)
If you had any principles, then surely right now, when the American people are set to blame President Bush and John McCain for a crisis they tried to prevent, and are actually shifting to approve of Barack Obama because of a crisis he helped cause, you would be laboring at least as hard to correct that false impression.
Your job, as journalists, is to tell the truth. That's what you claim you do, when you accept people's money to buy or subscribe to your paper. (my emphasis)
But right now, you are consenting to or actively promoting a big fat lie — that the housing crisis should somehow be blamed on Bush, McCain, and the Republicans. You have trained the American people to blame everything bad — even bad weather — on Bush, and they are responding as you have taught them to.
If you had any personal honor, each reporter and editor would be insisting on telling the truth — even if it hurts the election chances of your favorite candidate.
Because that's what honorable people do. Honest people tell the truth even when they don't like the probable consequences. That's what honesty means . That's how trust is earned.
Barack Obama is just another politician, and not a very wise one. He has revealed his ignorance and naivete time after time — and you have swept it under the rug, treated it as nothing.
Meanwhile, you have participated in the borking of Sarah Palin, reporting savage attacks on her for the pregnancy of her unmarried daughter — while you ignored the story of John Edwards's own adultery for many months.
So I ask you now: Do you have any standards at all? Do you even know what honesty means?
Is getting people to vote for Barack Obama so important that you will throw away everything that journalism is supposed to stand for?
You might want to remember the way the National Organization of Women threw away their integrity by supporting Bill Clinton despite his well-known pattern of sexual exploitation of powerless women. Who listens to NOW anymore? We know they stand for nothing; they have no principles.
That's where you are right now.
It's not too late. You know that if the situation were reversed, and the truth would damage McCain and help Obama, you would be moving heaven and earth to get the true story out there.
If you want to redeem your honor, you will swallow hard and make a list of all the stories you would print if it were McCain who had been getting money from Fannie Mae, McCain whose campaign had consulted with its discredited former CEO, McCain who had voted against tightening its lending practices.
Then you will print them, even though every one of those true stories will point the finger of blame at the reckless Democratic Party, which put our nation's prosperity at risk so they could feel good about helping the poor, and lay a fair share of the blame at Obama's door.
You will also tell the truth about John McCain: that he tried, as a Senator, to do what it took to prevent this crisis. You will tell the truth about President Bush: that his administration tried more than once to get Congress to regulate lending in a responsible way.
This was a Congress-caused crisis, beginning during the Clinton administration, with Democrats leading the way into the crisis and blocking every effort to get out of it in a timely fashion.
If you at our local daily newspaper continue to let Americans believe — and vote as if — President Bush and the Republicans caused the crisis, then you are joining in that lie.
If you do not tell the truth about the Democrats — including Barack Obama — and do so with the same energy you would use if the miscreants were Republicans — then you are not journalists by any standard.
You're just the public relations machine of the Democratic Party, and it's time you were all fired and real journalists brought in, so that we can actually have a news paper in our city.
This article first appeared in The Rhinoceros Times of Greensboro, North Carolina, and is used here by permission.
Kudos Mr. Card...
Bravo!
DR
H/T: Powerline blog
10/21/2008
OBAMA REVIEWED BILL AYERS BOOK: "SEARING AND TIMELY ACCOUNT.."
Kudos to Zomblog for digging this up
Michelle Malkin posted this excerpt from Bill Ayers book where he mentions Barack Obama...
Michelle Malkin posted this excerpt from Bill Ayers book where he mentions Barack Obama...
Tell me they didn't know each other...c'mon...I want to hear you say it...
DR
JOE BIDEN: OBAMA WILL BE TESTED BY TERRORISTS
Right Wing News has the Audio...
Madeline Albright agrees
Now I understand that both Barack Obama and Joe Biden have gone into hiding...
DR
Madeline Albright agrees
Now I understand that both Barack Obama and Joe Biden have gone into hiding...
DR
BARNEY FRANK: FOCUS ON IMMEDIATE INCREASE IN SPENDING; THERE ARE PLENTY OF RICH PEOPLE WE CAN TAX
YES! Barney Frank said exactly that!
When asked reigning in spending when talking about the proposed second stimulus bill with a 300 BILLION PRICE TAG:
"..at this point there needs to be a focus on a(sic) immediate increase in spending..and I think this is a time when deficit fear has to take a second seat..."
"...yes I believe later on there should be tax increases...I think there are a lot of very rich people out there whom we can tax at a point down the road and recover some of this money"
Yep, you just can't make this stuff up...
DR
When asked reigning in spending when talking about the proposed second stimulus bill with a 300 BILLION PRICE TAG:
"..at this point there needs to be a focus on a(sic) immediate increase in spending..and I think this is a time when deficit fear has to take a second seat..."
"...yes I believe later on there should be tax increases...I think there are a lot of very rich people out there whom we can tax at a point down the road and recover some of this money"
Yep, you just can't make this stuff up...
DR
AMERICANS OPPOSE INCOME REDISTRIBUTION TO FIX ECONOMY
PRINCETON, NJ -- When given a choice about how government should address the numerous economic difficulties facing today's consumer, Americans overwhelmingly -- by 84% to 13% -- prefer that the government focus on improving overall economic conditions and the jobs situation in the United States as opposed to taking steps to distribute wealth more evenly among Americans.
10/17/2008
OBAMA MAKES FUN OF JOE THE PLUMBER AS THE CROWD LAUGHS
This is shocking...
This is how Barack Obama really feels about working Americans.
DR
This is how Barack Obama really feels about working Americans.
DR
10/16/2008
JOE THE PLUMBER SPEAKS OUT - OBAMA TAP DANCES AROUND ISSUES
What about Joe the Plumber?
He spoke to Katie Couric and expressed concerns about Obama...
specifically whether or when Obama would consider that $100,000 is too much instead of $250,000
Joe also said:
"McCain was solid in his performance," he says. "I still don't know where he stands," he says of Obama. "I'm middle class. I can't have my taxes raised any more."
and
referring to his encounter with Obama, the Illinois Senator does "a tap dance...almost as good as Sammy Davis, Jr."
DR
H/T: Ben Smith blog
He spoke to Katie Couric and expressed concerns about Obama...
specifically whether or when Obama would consider that $100,000 is too much instead of $250,000
Joe also said:
"McCain was solid in his performance," he says. "I still don't know where he stands," he says of Obama. "I'm middle class. I can't have my taxes raised any more."
and
referring to his encounter with Obama, the Illinois Senator does "a tap dance...almost as good as Sammy Davis, Jr."
DR
H/T: Ben Smith blog
MORE ON JOE BIDEN'S CLAIM TO BE AN "ORDINARY MAN"
Is anyone else paying attention to how many times Joe Biden says "in my neighborhood"?
the acquisition of his waterfront property a decade ago involved wealthy businessmen and campaign supporters, some of them bankers with an interest in legislation before the Senate, who bought his old house for top dollar, sold him four acres at cost and lent him $500,000 to build his new home.
Of course, the entire article in the NYT reports discrepencies or questionable favorable treatment that Joe Biden has received, even noting that the bank that Biden got his huge home building loan from was the same bank that James H. Gilliam Jr. worked for, the same James H. Gilliam Jr. that Biden had offered to nominate for a federal judge's position...but, of course, that had NOTHING IN COMMON:
Not long before Mr. Biden obtained his construction loan from Beneficial in July 1997, he had offered to nominate the bank’s chairman, James H. Gilliam Jr., for a federal judge’s post in Delaware, according to news accounts of Mr. Gilliam’s death in 2003. Mr. Gilliam, a lawyer who also headed a state judiciary nomination panel and donated to Mr. Biden’s campaigns, declined the offer and recommended someone else, whom Mr. Biden nominated in June 1997.
Mr. Biden’s campaign said that his dealings with Mr. Gilliam had nothing to do with the $634,000 in loans he received from Beneficial, adding that Mr. Biden had other reasons to consider Mr. Gilliam, who would have been Delaware’s first African-American federal judge.
I know that Joe the Plumber doesn't live in a millions dollars mansion...neither do I...neither do you...
But Joe Biden's constant reference to the "people in my neighborhood" as if Joe Biden is living in suburbia is out and out LIES
The entire Obama - Biden campaign is built on lies...
I just hope people are really paying attention...
DR
the acquisition of his waterfront property a decade ago involved wealthy businessmen and campaign supporters, some of them bankers with an interest in legislation before the Senate, who bought his old house for top dollar, sold him four acres at cost and lent him $500,000 to build his new home.
Of course, the entire article in the NYT reports discrepencies or questionable favorable treatment that Joe Biden has received, even noting that the bank that Biden got his huge home building loan from was the same bank that James H. Gilliam Jr. worked for, the same James H. Gilliam Jr. that Biden had offered to nominate for a federal judge's position...but, of course, that had NOTHING IN COMMON:
Not long before Mr. Biden obtained his construction loan from Beneficial in July 1997, he had offered to nominate the bank’s chairman, James H. Gilliam Jr., for a federal judge’s post in Delaware, according to news accounts of Mr. Gilliam’s death in 2003. Mr. Gilliam, a lawyer who also headed a state judiciary nomination panel and donated to Mr. Biden’s campaigns, declined the offer and recommended someone else, whom Mr. Biden nominated in June 1997.
Mr. Biden’s campaign said that his dealings with Mr. Gilliam had nothing to do with the $634,000 in loans he received from Beneficial, adding that Mr. Biden had other reasons to consider Mr. Gilliam, who would have been Delaware’s first African-American federal judge.
I know that Joe the Plumber doesn't live in a millions dollars mansion...neither do I...neither do you...
But Joe Biden's constant reference to the "people in my neighborhood" as if Joe Biden is living in suburbia is out and out LIES
The entire Obama - Biden campaign is built on lies...
I just hope people are really paying attention...
DR
JOE BIDEN THINKS JOE THE PLUMBER IS TOO RICH
Thanks to some very fast bloggers, here is the video this morning of Joe Biden saying Joe the Plumber is too rich: H/T: The Autopsy
"I don't have any plumbers in my neighborhood that make $250,000"
OH REALLY?
Joe Biden's constant referral to "his neighborhood" are ludicrous! Biden lives in a mansion - 6,800 feet worth - and he claims that "no plumbers in his neighborhood make $250,000", rather make $98,000.
THAT IS AN OUTRIGHT LIE
Mr. Biden’s 6,800-square-foot colonial-style house sits on four lakefront acres that he bought in March 1996 for $350,000. From the New York Times.
Now worth @ $1,383,599.00
But, hey....who's checking up on a lie from liberals, right?
Obama - Biden's campaign is built on lies...they are lying to the American people...and all the liberal media is showing is giddiness in the streets...
Be afraid, people...be very afraid...
DR
"I don't have any plumbers in my neighborhood that make $250,000"
OH REALLY?
Joe Biden's constant referral to "his neighborhood" are ludicrous! Biden lives in a mansion - 6,800 feet worth - and he claims that "no plumbers in his neighborhood make $250,000", rather make $98,000.
THAT IS AN OUTRIGHT LIE
Mr. Biden’s 6,800-square-foot colonial-style house sits on four lakefront acres that he bought in March 1996 for $350,000. From the New York Times.
Now worth @ $1,383,599.00
But, hey....who's checking up on a lie from liberals, right?
Obama - Biden's campaign is built on lies...they are lying to the American people...and all the liberal media is showing is giddiness in the streets...
Be afraid, people...be very afraid...
DR
OBAMA CLAIMS THAT 100% OF MCCAINS ADS HAVE BEEN NEGATIVE IS JUST ANOTHER LIE
Remember the 2008 Democratic National Convention when Senator McCain congratulated Senator Obama????
LIES BY OBAMA
What happened during the Republican National Convention?
OBAMA WENT ON O'REILLY ON FOX NEWS
MORE LIES BY OBAMA
The day after Obama crying about McCain's "negative ads" this is running
By the way, Obama keeps claiming that McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time...the president of this country does not vote, Congress does...but, hey, what's one more lie
DR
LIES BY OBAMA
What happened during the Republican National Convention?
OBAMA WENT ON O'REILLY ON FOX NEWS
MORE LIES BY OBAMA
The day after Obama crying about McCain's "negative ads" this is running
By the way, Obama keeps claiming that McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time...the president of this country does not vote, Congress does...but, hey, what's one more lie
DR
10/15/2008
Ayers' office door is decorated with pictures of Mumia Abu-Jamal, Che Guevara and Malcolm X
Daniel Faulkner, murdered in cold blood by Mumia Abu-Jamal
Mumia Abu-Jamal
Che Guevera pictures were hanging in Obama campaign offices
Bill Ayers office door celebrates criminals, communist terrorists
Mumia Abu-Jamal
Che Guevera pictures were hanging in Obama campaign offices
Bill Ayers office door celebrates criminals, communist terrorists
If anyone thinks that Bill Ayers is "repentant", think again...
Bill Ayers has simply gone underground...shockingly, he has held a position of influence among the most impressionable among us...our children!
Bill Ayers has simply gone underground...shockingly, he has held a position of influence among the most impressionable among us...our children!
So who exactly are Mumia Abu-Jamal, Che Guevara and Malcolm X?
On December 9, 1981, at approximately 3:55 a.m., Officer Danny Faulkner, a five year veteran of the Philadelphia Police Department, made a traffic stop at Locust Street near Twelfth Street. The car stopped by Officer Faulkner was being driven by William Cook. After making the stop, Danny called for assistance on his police radio and requested a police wagon to transport a prisoner. Unbeknownst to him, William Cook's brother, Wesley (aka Mumia Abu-Jamal) was across the street. As Danny attempted to handcuff William Cook, Mumia Abu-Jamal ran from across the street and shot the officer in the back. Danny turned and was able to fire one shot that struck Abu-Jamal in the chest; the wounded officer then fell to the pavement. Mumia Abu-Jamal stood over the downed officer and shot him four more times at close range, once directly in the face. Mumia Abu-Jamal was found still at the scene of the shooting by officers who arrived there within seconds. The murderer was slumped against the curb in front of his brother's car. In his possession was a .38 caliber revolver that records showed Mumia had purchased months earlier. The chamber of the gun had five spent cartridges. A cab driver, as well as other pedestrians, had witnessed the brutal slaying and identified Mumia Abu-Jamal as the killer both at the scene and during his trial. On July 2, 1982, after being tried before a jury of ten whites and two blacks, Mumia Abu-Jamal was convicted of murdering Officer Danny Faulkner. The next day, the jury sentenced him to death after deliberating for two hours. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania heard the defendant's appeals and upheld the conviction on March 6, 1989.
Officer Danny Faulkner joined the ranks of those courageous officers who have given their lives to keep our nation's streets safe and free. Danny and his wife, Maureen, had been married only slightly more than a year. Now, she was left a widow with only her memories of the young officer to comfort her and dreams of the life they could have shared together. Danny and Maureen Faulkner are the real victims of that horrible night in December, 1981. It is for them that we seek justice and the reason this site stands strong today. Please visit the many places on this site put together to help create awareness. Remember to spread the word.
Yes, liberals celebrate, defend and embrace murderers...Bill Ayers honors a murderer on his own door...Bill Ayers, the terrorist that has orchestrated murders of policemen...
Che Guevara was a terrorist and communist mass murder - another liberal "hero":
"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary...These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution! And a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate. We must create the pedagogy of the The Wall!" --Ernesto 'Che' Guevara
"The Wall" meaning the wall that Che Guevara so happily put people up against to shoot them.
But Che didn't always bother with the wall. One of his favored methods of killing was to tie his victim to a chair, gag him, walk around the room a bit ranting at him, and then slowly walk up, pistol in hand — and splatter the victim's brains and skull across the room while his companions watched.
"The Wall" meaning the wall that Che Guevara so happily put people up against to shoot them.
But Che didn't always bother with the wall. One of his favored methods of killing was to tie his victim to a chair, gag him, walk around the room a bit ranting at him, and then slowly walk up, pistol in hand — and splatter the victim's brains and skull across the room while his companions watched.
And don't forget that earlier this year, pictures of Che Guevera were hanging in Obama campaign offices.
Finally, Malcolm X (for those of you that have been living in an underground bunker all these years)...
All of us are black first, and everything else second.
Malcolm X,"God's angry men", WO, 31 May 1958 (FBI files 105-8999-788)
Malcolm X,"God's angry men", WO, 31 May 1958 (FBI files 105-8999-788)
You show me a capitalist and I'll show you a bloodsucker.
Malcolm X, NYC, 20 Dec. 1964
Malcolm X, NYC, 20 Dec. 1964
These are some of the ones 'honored' on Bill Ayers door...
Any wonder why so many people have real concerns about Barack Obama and his friend Bill Ayers?
DR
DR
10/14/2008
"Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, Kill your parents."
Lest we forget how passionate the REAL Bill Ayers is.
Born in 1944, Bill Ayers, along with his wife Bernardine Dohrn, was a 1960s leader of the homegrown terrorist group Weatherman, a Communist-driven splinter faction of Students for a Democratic Society. Characterizing Weatherman as "an American Red Army," Ayers summed up the organization's ideology as follows: "Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, Kill your parents."
More Ayers quotes:
"What a country," Ayers said in 2001. "It makes me want to puke."
Of the day he bombed the Pentagon, Ayers says, "Everything was absolutely ideal. ... The sky was blue. The birds were singing. And the bastards were finally going to get what was coming to them."
Ayers' comment on his life, as reported by Peter Collier and David Horowitz in their authoritative chapter on Weatherman in Destructive Generation, is this: "Guilty as sin, free as a bird, America is a great country."
Bill Ayers is a friend and admirer of Hugo Chavez. Ayers has traveled numerous times to Venezuela, extolling the virtues of revolution. Many liberal defenders of Ayers claim that he has redeemed himself through working in the field of education, but there is a very dark side to Ayers work there.
In 2006 during a visit to Venezuela, Ayers said: "We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution..."
Ayers and his wife, fellow Weatherman terrorist Bernardine Dohrn, raised the son of convicted fellow Weathermen Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert.
Michelle Malkin wrote in 2002: From both his biological and adoptive parents, Chesa Boudin has learned to stew in the indignant self-pity of Marxist leftovers
Boudin stands by the Weathermen's revolutionary agenda: "My parents were all dedicated to fighting U.S. imperialism around the world. I'm dedicated to the same thing."
This is the man that worked with Barack Obama on the Woods Fund board, funneling hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars, through government grants, to activist groups ACORN and AAAN (Arab American Action Network).
Bill Ayers is not someone that has 'reformed'. Bill Ayers continues his work today in different avenues. Ayers is influencing young people through his position as a university professor. Ayers, quite simply, has gone underground with his mission.
There is a common thread throughout all of this. Remember that Barack Obama's mother and grandparents were communist sympathizers. While living in Hawaii one of Barack Obama's mentors was another communist, Frank Davis Marshall. Obama stated in one of his books that he used to listen to Marshall's "poetry".
Spengler writes in Asia Times:
Barack Obama is a clever fellow who imbibed hatred of America with his mother's milk, but worked his way up the elite ladder of education and career. He shares the resentment of Muslims against the encroachment of American culture, although not their religion. He has the empathetic skill set of an anthropologist who lives with his subjects, learns their language, and elicits their hopes and fears while remaining at emotional distance. That is, he is the political equivalent of a sociopath. The difference is that he is practicing not on a primitive tribe but on the population of the United States.
America has the great misfortune to have encountered Obama at the peak of his powers at its worst moment of vulnerability in a generation. With malice aforethought, he has sought out their sore point.
Barack Obama's past is cloudy, intentionally so I believe.
Even the New York Times was unable to reveal much:
Barack Obama does not say much about his years in New York City. The time he spent as an undergraduate at Columbia College and then working in Manhattan in the early 1980s surfaces only fleetingly in his memoir. In the book, he casts himself as a solitary wanderer in the metropolis, the outsider searching for a way to “make myself of some use.”
Mr. Obama has, of course, done plenty of remembering. His 1995 memoir, “Dreams From My Father,” weighs in at more than 450 pages. But he also exercised his writer’s prerogative to decide what to include or leave out. Now, as he presents himself to voters, a look at his years in New York — other people’s accounts and his own — suggests not only what he was like back then but how he chooses to be seen now.
There still, only 28 days away from the 2008 election, do not know much about Barack Obama. There are still so many unanswered questions. There are still so many obvious problems, but with the help of the liberal main-stream-media, most of these continue to be shoved aside while accusations fly about Obama's opponent, John McCain.
A red herring, I say.
This is why I am extremely concerned about Barack Obama's association with Bill Ayers.
I think you should be concerned too.
We need to know who Barack Obama REALLY is. I think I do, do you?
DR
Born in 1944, Bill Ayers, along with his wife Bernardine Dohrn, was a 1960s leader of the homegrown terrorist group Weatherman, a Communist-driven splinter faction of Students for a Democratic Society. Characterizing Weatherman as "an American Red Army," Ayers summed up the organization's ideology as follows: "Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, Kill your parents."
More Ayers quotes:
"What a country," Ayers said in 2001. "It makes me want to puke."
Of the day he bombed the Pentagon, Ayers says, "Everything was absolutely ideal. ... The sky was blue. The birds were singing. And the bastards were finally going to get what was coming to them."
Ayers' comment on his life, as reported by Peter Collier and David Horowitz in their authoritative chapter on Weatherman in Destructive Generation, is this: "Guilty as sin, free as a bird, America is a great country."
Bill Ayers is a friend and admirer of Hugo Chavez. Ayers has traveled numerous times to Venezuela, extolling the virtues of revolution. Many liberal defenders of Ayers claim that he has redeemed himself through working in the field of education, but there is a very dark side to Ayers work there.
In 2006 during a visit to Venezuela, Ayers said: "We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution..."
Ayers and his wife, fellow Weatherman terrorist Bernardine Dohrn, raised the son of convicted fellow Weathermen Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert.
Michelle Malkin wrote in 2002: From both his biological and adoptive parents, Chesa Boudin has learned to stew in the indignant self-pity of Marxist leftovers
Boudin stands by the Weathermen's revolutionary agenda: "My parents were all dedicated to fighting U.S. imperialism around the world. I'm dedicated to the same thing."
This is the man that worked with Barack Obama on the Woods Fund board, funneling hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars, through government grants, to activist groups ACORN and AAAN (Arab American Action Network).
Bill Ayers is not someone that has 'reformed'. Bill Ayers continues his work today in different avenues. Ayers is influencing young people through his position as a university professor. Ayers, quite simply, has gone underground with his mission.
There is a common thread throughout all of this. Remember that Barack Obama's mother and grandparents were communist sympathizers. While living in Hawaii one of Barack Obama's mentors was another communist, Frank Davis Marshall. Obama stated in one of his books that he used to listen to Marshall's "poetry".
Spengler writes in Asia Times:
Barack Obama is a clever fellow who imbibed hatred of America with his mother's milk, but worked his way up the elite ladder of education and career. He shares the resentment of Muslims against the encroachment of American culture, although not their religion. He has the empathetic skill set of an anthropologist who lives with his subjects, learns their language, and elicits their hopes and fears while remaining at emotional distance. That is, he is the political equivalent of a sociopath. The difference is that he is practicing not on a primitive tribe but on the population of the United States.
America has the great misfortune to have encountered Obama at the peak of his powers at its worst moment of vulnerability in a generation. With malice aforethought, he has sought out their sore point.
Barack Obama's past is cloudy, intentionally so I believe.
Even the New York Times was unable to reveal much:
Barack Obama does not say much about his years in New York City. The time he spent as an undergraduate at Columbia College and then working in Manhattan in the early 1980s surfaces only fleetingly in his memoir. In the book, he casts himself as a solitary wanderer in the metropolis, the outsider searching for a way to “make myself of some use.”
Mr. Obama has, of course, done plenty of remembering. His 1995 memoir, “Dreams From My Father,” weighs in at more than 450 pages. But he also exercised his writer’s prerogative to decide what to include or leave out. Now, as he presents himself to voters, a look at his years in New York — other people’s accounts and his own — suggests not only what he was like back then but how he chooses to be seen now.
There still, only 28 days away from the 2008 election, do not know much about Barack Obama. There are still so many unanswered questions. There are still so many obvious problems, but with the help of the liberal main-stream-media, most of these continue to be shoved aside while accusations fly about Obama's opponent, John McCain.
A red herring, I say.
This is why I am extremely concerned about Barack Obama's association with Bill Ayers.
I think you should be concerned too.
We need to know who Barack Obama REALLY is. I think I do, do you?
DR
10/13/2008
OBAMA: I WANT TO SPREAD THE WEALTH AROUND
He said it!
Obama was off teleprompter when he was talking to this man and said what we all know:
that Obama's TRUE "ECONOMIC PLAN" IS INCOME REDISTRIBUTION - IE: SOCIALISM.
DR
Obama was off teleprompter when he was talking to this man and said what we all know:
that Obama's TRUE "ECONOMIC PLAN" IS INCOME REDISTRIBUTION - IE: SOCIALISM.
DR
10/12/2008
OBAMA STILL PROMOTING TALKING TO IRAN WITHOUT PRECONDITIONS
Oh! and just for the record, Obama STILL has on his website the following:
Diplomacy: Obama supports tough, direct presidential diplomacy with Iran without preconditions.
Just in case they take it down or change it, I have captured it here with today's date.
DR
Diplomacy: Obama supports tough, direct presidential diplomacy with Iran without preconditions.
Just in case they take it down or change it, I have captured it here with today's date.
DR
BARACK OBAMA AND BILL AYERS
The relationship between Ayers and Obama is much more than just about an unrepentant terrorist. Somewhere in the rhetoric, I think this important fact is being overlooked.
OF COURSE it is important that William Ayers ploted to bomb the Pentagon and killed policemen, but the fact that Ayers and Barack Obama worked together to funnel Federal dollars to activist groups is much more damaging.
Obama and Ayers sat on the Woods Foundation and gave thousands of dollars to ACORN and AAAN (Arab American Action Network) a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a "catastrophe" and supports intense immigration reform, including providing drivers licenses and education to illegal aliens.
Bill Ayers is friends with Hugo Chavez, he has been to Venezuela numerous times and Chavez speaks very highly of Ayers.
Hugo Chavez is someone that Barack Obama has said he would sit down and talk with WITHOUT preconditions.
Those are the first things that come to mind. THOSE are concerns that Americans have about Bill Ayers and Barack Obama.
DR
OF COURSE it is important that William Ayers ploted to bomb the Pentagon and killed policemen, but the fact that Ayers and Barack Obama worked together to funnel Federal dollars to activist groups is much more damaging.
Obama and Ayers sat on the Woods Foundation and gave thousands of dollars to ACORN and AAAN (Arab American Action Network) a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a "catastrophe" and supports intense immigration reform, including providing drivers licenses and education to illegal aliens.
Bill Ayers is friends with Hugo Chavez, he has been to Venezuela numerous times and Chavez speaks very highly of Ayers.
Hugo Chavez is someone that Barack Obama has said he would sit down and talk with WITHOUT preconditions.
Those are the first things that come to mind. THOSE are concerns that Americans have about Bill Ayers and Barack Obama.
DR
10/09/2008
10/08/2008
ORDINARY PEOPLE CAN DO EXTRAORDINARY THINGS IF THEY ARE ORGANIZED
Where have you heard those words lately?
Barack Obama, right?
Barack Obama has those words on his website
Barack Obama said those words in this audio clip on Super Tuesday
Barack Obama has said those words throughout this campaign...but those words are not Barack Obama's words...those words are from the New Party Principles
It is all over the internet now that Barack Obama was a New Party candidate in Illinois in 1996...
No Quarter reports: Barack Obama was an active participant in the 1990s, and a direct political beneficiary, of the Chicago New Party and, importantly, the Chicago DSA, a group of socialists affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America.
Part of the New Party Principles read:
Popular democratic organization should be encouraged and strengthened to make this peaceful revolution. Ordinary people can do extraordinary things if they are organized.
How interesting...
Barack Obama's carefully crafted past is starting to unravel...there are just too many questions that have gone unanswered...too many holes...too many inconsistencies...
Apparently Barack Obama 'forgot' to mention his ties to the Democratic Socialists of America...but that catchy phrase seems to have stuck in his head...you know, like a song that you just can't get out of your head...
Funny how little things like this always trip people up...it's always in the details...
DR
Barack Obama, right?
Barack Obama has those words on his website
Barack Obama said those words in this audio clip on Super Tuesday
Barack Obama has said those words throughout this campaign...but those words are not Barack Obama's words...those words are from the New Party Principles
It is all over the internet now that Barack Obama was a New Party candidate in Illinois in 1996...
No Quarter reports: Barack Obama was an active participant in the 1990s, and a direct political beneficiary, of the Chicago New Party and, importantly, the Chicago DSA, a group of socialists affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America.
Part of the New Party Principles read:
Popular democratic organization should be encouraged and strengthened to make this peaceful revolution. Ordinary people can do extraordinary things if they are organized.
How interesting...
Barack Obama's carefully crafted past is starting to unravel...there are just too many questions that have gone unanswered...too many holes...too many inconsistencies...
Apparently Barack Obama 'forgot' to mention his ties to the Democratic Socialists of America...but that catchy phrase seems to have stuck in his head...you know, like a song that you just can't get out of your head...
Funny how little things like this always trip people up...it's always in the details...
DR
BILL AYERS - HUGO CHAVEZ - CHICAGO 8 - CONNECTING THE DOTS
What is this connection? What does it mean?
While looking at Bill Ayers blog and making note of his ties to Hugo Chavez and Ayers’ promotion of ‘revolution education’...
A link from Ayers' page to one called "The Other Eye"...
One of the entries posted July 11, 2008 bemoans the fact that illegal youth are struggling with the fact that college will be difficult for them to get into. (FORGET the fact that a lot of LEGAL, taxpaying citizens have the same worries!!)
Then I noticed that the entry was written by some participants in “the 8 project, Chicago Illinois”
The 8 project…what is that?
Could it have something to do with the Chicago Eight?
I think it does...it shows the same mindset that we have been expressing concern about with Bill Ayers...why name a school project after antiwar activists?
The trial for eight antiwar activists charged with the responsibility for the violent demonstrations at the August 1968 Democratic National Convention opens in Chicago. The defendants included David Dellinger of the National Mobilization Committee (NMC); Rennie Davis and Thomas Hayden of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS); Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, founders of the Youth International Party ("Yippies"); Bobby Seale of the Black Panthers; and two lesser known activists, Lee Weiner and John Froines.
The group was charged with conspiracy to cross state lines with intent to incite a riot. All but Seale were represented by attorneys William Kunstler and Leonard Weinglass. The trial, presided over by Judge Julius Hoffman, turned into a circus as the defendants and their attorneys used the court as a platform to attack Nixon, the war, racisim, and oppression. Their tactics were so disruptive that at one point, Judge Hoffman ordered Seale gagged and strapped to his chair. When the trial ended in February 1970, Hoffman found the defendants and their attorneys guilty of 175 counts of contempt of court and sentenced them to terms between two to four years.
From the looks of it, the terrorists are still alive and well, living in our schools, teaching our children.
Bill Ayers and his associations play a much larger and more ominous role in who Barack Obama is.
The Ayers connection goes deeper and gets more troublesome the more we take a look at it, and I believe that we have only scratched the surface.
DR
H/T American Thinker for the Hugo Chavez connection
While looking at Bill Ayers blog and making note of his ties to Hugo Chavez and Ayers’ promotion of ‘revolution education’...
A link from Ayers' page to one called "The Other Eye"...
One of the entries posted July 11, 2008 bemoans the fact that illegal youth are struggling with the fact that college will be difficult for them to get into. (FORGET the fact that a lot of LEGAL, taxpaying citizens have the same worries!!)
Then I noticed that the entry was written by some participants in “the 8 project, Chicago Illinois”
The 8 project…what is that?
Could it have something to do with the Chicago Eight?
I think it does...it shows the same mindset that we have been expressing concern about with Bill Ayers...why name a school project after antiwar activists?
The trial for eight antiwar activists charged with the responsibility for the violent demonstrations at the August 1968 Democratic National Convention opens in Chicago. The defendants included David Dellinger of the National Mobilization Committee (NMC); Rennie Davis and Thomas Hayden of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS); Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, founders of the Youth International Party ("Yippies"); Bobby Seale of the Black Panthers; and two lesser known activists, Lee Weiner and John Froines.
The group was charged with conspiracy to cross state lines with intent to incite a riot. All but Seale were represented by attorneys William Kunstler and Leonard Weinglass. The trial, presided over by Judge Julius Hoffman, turned into a circus as the defendants and their attorneys used the court as a platform to attack Nixon, the war, racisim, and oppression. Their tactics were so disruptive that at one point, Judge Hoffman ordered Seale gagged and strapped to his chair. When the trial ended in February 1970, Hoffman found the defendants and their attorneys guilty of 175 counts of contempt of court and sentenced them to terms between two to four years.
From the looks of it, the terrorists are still alive and well, living in our schools, teaching our children.
Bill Ayers and his associations play a much larger and more ominous role in who Barack Obama is.
The Ayers connection goes deeper and gets more troublesome the more we take a look at it, and I believe that we have only scratched the surface.
DR
H/T American Thinker for the Hugo Chavez connection
10/06/2008
OUR COUNTRY DESERVES BETTER
From the website of Our Country Deserves Better PAC
We are a national effort focused on defeating Barack Obama's presidential campaign because Obama would be a disastrous president.
The Our Country Deserves Better committee is determined to tell the truth that is not being told by many in the media and among our national leaders: Barack Obama is an inexperienced, far-left, naive, "Blame America First" arrogant liberal, and that our country deserves better for our next President and Commander-in-Chief.
Our Country Deserves Better than Barack Obama - and with your help we can ensure that Barack Obama is defeated on November 4th.
Patriotic rallies will be held across the nation Oct 15-29
DR
We are a national effort focused on defeating Barack Obama's presidential campaign because Obama would be a disastrous president.
The Our Country Deserves Better committee is determined to tell the truth that is not being told by many in the media and among our national leaders: Barack Obama is an inexperienced, far-left, naive, "Blame America First" arrogant liberal, and that our country deserves better for our next President and Commander-in-Chief.
Our Country Deserves Better than Barack Obama - and with your help we can ensure that Barack Obama is defeated on November 4th.
Patriotic rallies will be held across the nation Oct 15-29
DR
POSTING VARIOUS VIDEOS...
...has been my focus lately...
been busy campaigning for the McCain / Palin ticket
DR
been busy campaigning for the McCain / Palin ticket
DR
10/01/2008
CHILDREN SING TO OBAMA..CAN YOU SAY HITLER YOUTH??
Indoctrinated Children Sing Praises to Dear Leader Obamessiah
Can you say Hitler Youth!?
Can you say indoctrinated children singing to N. Korea's Dear Leader?!
Unbelievable...
Well, perhaps yesterday...perhaps last year...perhaps not too long ago this would be unbelievable...
DR
Can you say Hitler Youth!?
Can you say indoctrinated children singing to N. Korea's Dear Leader?!
Unbelievable...
Well, perhaps yesterday...perhaps last year...perhaps not too long ago this would be unbelievable...
DR
OBAMA SUPPORTER TO "MODERATE" VP DEBATE
THIS is outrageous!
No, it really borders on criminal if the debate commission is putting this out as an unbiased, fair and balanced debate.
DR
H/T: Michelle Malkin, Amanda Carpenter, and Greta VanSustern
No, it really borders on criminal if the debate commission is putting this out as an unbiased, fair and balanced debate.
DR
H/T: Michelle Malkin, Amanda Carpenter, and Greta VanSustern
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)