Joe Biden finally...FINALLY...gets a "tough" interview, and he turns around and attacks the reporter...I found the interview:

WFTV’s Barbara West, an Orland anchorwoman, grilled Biden on everything from his running mate’s connections to Acorn to his statement that Obama would be “tested” by an international crisis and may make decisions that don’t immediately seem like the right ones — and even quoted Karl Marx to ask how Obama would be any different from the Communist founder who favored redistributing wealth to society’s underclass.

“Is this a joke?” Biden asked after the Marxism line. “Is that a real question?” West assured him that it was.

West later asked if Obama wanted to make the United States a socialist country “like Sweden,” and whether Biden’s “tested” remarks meant that Obama’s leadership would result in the United States losing it’s status as the world’s lone superpower.

“I don’t know who’s writing your questions,” Biden replied.

One point: Biden stated that the Obama campaign had "never given money to ACORN"...which is a lie...just because the money was given to Citizen Services Inc. (CSI) and not to ACORN directly, it is a well known fact that CSI is a subsidiary corporation of ACORN...

The Obama campaign, knowing the impact of funneling the money to ACORN, hid the contribution...or tried to...which is a criminal offense, imo...

but I digress...

...unfortunately, Breitbart tv has removed it but they have a writeup on the Obama campaign's cancellation of a subsequent interview:

After this interview the Obama campaign canceled a scheduled interview with Jill Biden: "There's nothing wrong with tough questions, but reporters have the very important job of sharing the truth with the public -- not misleading the American people with false information. Senator Biden handled the interview well; however, the anchor was completely unprofessional. Senator Biden's wife is not running for elected office, and there are many other stations in the Orlando television market that would gladly conduct a respectful and factual interview with her." "This cancellation is non-negotiable, and further opportunities for your station to interview with this campaign are unlikely, at best for the duration of the remaining days until the election."

After all the horrible, shocking, appalling things that have been written and said about Governor Palin, Biden's reaction is disturbing...

The American people DESERVE to know the truth about Barack Obama...questions about what Barack Obama intends to do if he is elected are completely IN LINE and justifiable!




Orson Scott Card is a democrat

Orson Scott Card is a journalist

This must have been very difficult for Mr. Card to write, but Orson Scott Card calls it like it is:

Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights?
By Orson Scott Card

Editor's note: Orson Scott Card is a Democrat and a newspaper columnist, and in this opinion piece he takes on both while lamenting the current state of journalism.

An open letter to the local daily paper — almost every local daily paper in America:

I remember reading All the President's Men and thinking: That's journalism. You do what it takes to get the truth and you lay it before the public, because the public has a right to know.

This housing crisis didn't come out of nowhere. It was not a vague emanation of the evil Bush administration.

It was a direct result of the political decision, back in the late 1990s, to loosen the rules of lending so that home loans would be more accessible to poor people. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were authorized to approve risky loans.

What is a risky loan? It's a loan that the recipient is likely not to be able to repay.

The goal of this rule change was to help the poor — which especially would help members of minority groups. But how does it help these people to give them a loan that they can't repay? They get into a house, yes, but when they can't make the payments, they lose the house — along with their credit rating.

They end up worse off than before.

This was completely foreseeable and in fact many people did foresee it. One political party, in Congress and in the executive branch, tried repeatedly to tighten up the rules. The other party blocked every such attempt and tried to loosen them.

Furthermore, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were making political contributions to the very members of Congress who were allowing them to make irresponsible loans. (Though why quasi-federal agencies were allowed to do so baffles me. It's as if the Pentagon were allowed to contribute to the political campaigns of Congressmen who support increasing their budget.)

Isn't there a story here? Doesn't journalism require that you who produce our daily paper tell the truth about who brought us to a position where the only way to keep confidence in our economy was a $700 billion bailout? Aren't you supposed to follow the money and see which politicians were benefiting personally from the deregulation of mortgage lending?

I have no doubt that if these facts had pointed to the Republican Party or to John McCain as the guilty parties, you would be treating it as a vast scandal. "Housing-gate," no doubt. Or "Fannie-gate."

Instead, it was Senator Christopher Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank, both Democrats, who denied that there were any problems, who refused Bush administration requests to set up a regulatory agency to watch over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and who were still pushing for these agencies to go even further in promoting sub-prime mortgage loans almost up to the minute they failed.

As Thomas Sowell points out in a TownHall.com essay entitled "Do Facts Matter?" (
http://snipurl.com/457townhall_com] ): "Alan Greenspan warned them four years ago. So did the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers to the President. So did Bush's Secretary of the Treasury."

These are facts. This financial crisis was completely preventable. The party that blocked any attempt to prevent it was ... the Democratic Party. The party that tried to prevent it was ... the Republican Party.

Yet when Nancy Pelosi accused the Bush administration and Republican deregulation of causing the crisis, you in the press did not hold her to account for her lie. Instead, you criticized Republicans who took offense at this lie and refused to vote for the bailout!

What? It's not the liar, but the victims of the lie who are to blame?

Now let's follow the money ... right to the presidential candidate who is the number-two recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae.

And after Freddie Raines, the CEO of Fannie Mae who made $90 million while running it into the ground, was fired for his incompetence, one presidential candidate's campaign actually consulted him for advice on housing.

If that presidential candidate had been John McCain, you would have called it a major scandal and we would be getting stories in your paper every day about how incompetent and corrupt he was.

But instead, that candidate was Barack Obama, and so you have buried this story, and when the McCain campaign dared to call Raines an "adviser" to the Obama campaign — because that campaign had sought his advice — you actually let Obama's people get away with accusing McCain of lying, merely because Raines wasn't listed as an official adviser to the Obama campaign.

You would never tolerate such weasely nit-picking from a Republican.

If you who produce our local daily paper actually had any principles, you would be pounding this story, because the prosperity of all Americans was put at risk by the foolish, short-sighted, politically selfish, and possibly corrupt actions of leading Democrats, including Obama.
If you who produce our local daily paper had any personal honor, you would find it unbearable to let the American people believe that somehow Republicans were to blame for this crisis.

There are precedents. Even though President Bush and his administration never said that Iraq sponsored or was linked to 9/11, you could not stand the fact that Americans had that misapprehension — so you pounded us with the fact that there was no such link. (Along the way, you created the false impression that Bush had lied to them and said that there was a connection.)

If you had any principles, then surely right now, when the American people are set to blame President Bush and John McCain for a crisis they tried to prevent, and are actually shifting to approve of Barack Obama because of a crisis he helped cause, you would be laboring at least as hard to correct that false impression.

Your job, as journalists, is to tell the truth. That's what you claim you do, when you accept people's money to buy or subscribe to your paper. (my emphasis)

But right now, you are consenting to or actively promoting a big fat lie — that the housing crisis should somehow be blamed on Bush, McCain, and the Republicans. You have trained the American people to blame everything bad — even bad weather — on Bush, and they are responding as you have taught them to.

If you had any personal honor, each reporter and editor would be insisting on telling the truth — even if it hurts the election chances of your favorite candidate.

Because that's what honorable people do. Honest people tell the truth even when they don't like the probable consequences. That's what honesty means . That's how trust is earned.

Barack Obama is just another politician, and not a very wise one. He has revealed his ignorance and naivete time after time — and you have swept it under the rug, treated it as nothing.

Meanwhile, you have participated in the borking of Sarah Palin, reporting savage attacks on her for the pregnancy of her unmarried daughter — while you ignored the story of John Edwards's own adultery for many months.

So I ask you now: Do you have any standards at all? Do you even know what honesty means?

Is getting people to vote for Barack Obama so important that you will throw away everything that journalism is supposed to stand for?

You might want to remember the way the National Organization of Women threw away their integrity by supporting Bill Clinton despite his well-known pattern of sexual exploitation of powerless women. Who listens to NOW anymore? We know they stand for nothing; they have no principles.

That's where you are right now.

It's not too late. You know that if the situation were reversed, and the truth would damage McCain and help Obama, you would be moving heaven and earth to get the true story out there.

If you want to redeem your honor, you will swallow hard and make a list of all the stories you would print if it were McCain who had been getting money from Fannie Mae, McCain whose campaign had consulted with its discredited former CEO, McCain who had voted against tightening its lending practices.

Then you will print them, even though every one of those true stories will point the finger of blame at the reckless Democratic Party, which put our nation's prosperity at risk so they could feel good about helping the poor, and lay a fair share of the blame at Obama's door.

You will also tell the truth about John McCain: that he tried, as a Senator, to do what it took to prevent this crisis. You will tell the truth about President Bush: that his administration tried more than once to get Congress to regulate lending in a responsible way.

This was a Congress-caused crisis, beginning during the Clinton administration, with Democrats leading the way into the crisis and blocking every effort to get out of it in a timely fashion.

If you at our local daily newspaper continue to let Americans believe — and vote as if — President Bush and the Republicans caused the crisis, then you are joining in that lie.

If you do not tell the truth about the Democrats — including Barack Obama — and do so with the same energy you would use if the miscreants were Republicans — then you are not journalists by any standard.

You're just the public relations machine of the Democratic Party, and it's time you were all fired and real journalists brought in, so that we can actually have a news paper in our city.

This article first appeared in The Rhinoceros Times of Greensboro, North Carolina, and is used here by permission.

Kudos Mr. Card...


H/T: Powerline blog



Kudos to Zomblog for digging this up

Michelle Malkin posted this excerpt from Bill Ayers book where he mentions Barack Obama...
Tell me they didn't know each other...c'mon...I want to hear you say it...


Right Wing News has the Audio...

Madeline Albright agrees

Now I understand that both Barack Obama and Joe Biden have gone into hiding...



YES! Barney Frank said exactly that!

When asked reigning in spending when talking about the proposed second stimulus bill with a 300 BILLION PRICE TAG:

"..at this point there needs to be a focus on a(sic) immediate increase in spending..and I think this is a time when deficit fear has to take a second seat..."

"...yes I believe later on there should be tax increases...I think there are a lot of very rich people out there whom we can tax at a point down the road and recover some of this money"

Yep, you just can't make this stuff up...



PRINCETON, NJ -- When given a choice about how government should address the numerous economic difficulties facing today's consumer, Americans overwhelmingly -- by 84% to 13% -- prefer that the government focus on improving overall economic conditions and the jobs situation in the United States as opposed to taking steps to distribute wealth more evenly among Americans.

H/T: Jim Geraghty over at National Review



What about Joe the Plumber?

He spoke to Katie Couric and expressed concerns about Obama...

specifically whether or when Obama would consider that $100,000 is too much instead of $250,000

Joe also said:

"McCain was solid in his performance," he says. "I still don't know where he stands," he says of Obama. "I'm middle class. I can't have my taxes raised any more."


referring to his encounter with Obama, the Illinois Senator does "a tap dance...almost as good as Sammy Davis, Jr."


H/T: Ben Smith blog


Is anyone else paying attention to how many times Joe Biden says "in my neighborhood"?

the acquisition of his waterfront property a decade ago involved wealthy businessmen and campaign supporters, some of them bankers with an interest in legislation before the Senate, who bought his old house for top dollar, sold him four acres at cost and lent him $500,000 to build his new home.

Of course, the entire article in the NYT reports discrepencies or questionable favorable treatment that Joe Biden has received, even noting that the bank that Biden got his huge home building loan from was the same bank that James H. Gilliam Jr. worked for, the same James H. Gilliam Jr. that Biden had offered to nominate for a federal judge's position...but, of course, that had NOTHING IN COMMON:

Not long before Mr. Biden obtained his construction loan from Beneficial in July 1997, he had offered to nominate the bank’s chairman, James H. Gilliam Jr., for a federal judge’s post in Delaware, according to news accounts of Mr. Gilliam’s death in 2003. Mr. Gilliam, a lawyer who also headed a state judiciary nomination panel and donated to Mr. Biden’s campaigns, declined the offer and recommended someone else, whom Mr. Biden nominated in June 1997.

Mr. Biden’s campaign said that his dealings with Mr. Gilliam had nothing to do with the $634,000 in loans he received from Beneficial, adding that Mr. Biden had other reasons to consider Mr. Gilliam, who would have been Delaware’s first African-American federal judge.

I know that Joe the Plumber doesn't live in a millions dollars mansion...neither do I...neither do you...

But Joe Biden's constant reference to the "people in my neighborhood" as if Joe Biden is living in suburbia is out and out LIES

The entire Obama - Biden campaign is built on lies...

I just hope people are really paying attention...



Thanks to some very fast bloggers, here is the video this morning of Joe Biden saying Joe the Plumber is too rich: H/T: The Autopsy

"I don't have any plumbers in my neighborhood that make $250,000"


Joe Biden's constant referral to "his neighborhood" are ludicrous! Biden lives in a mansion - 6,800 feet worth - and he claims that "no plumbers in his neighborhood make $250,000", rather make $98,000.


Mr. Biden’s 6,800-square-foot colonial-style house sits on four lakefront acres that he bought in March 1996 for $350,000. From the New York Times.
Now worth
@ $1,383,599.00

But, hey....who's checking up on a lie from liberals, right?

Obama - Biden's campaign is built on lies...they are lying to the American people...and all the liberal media is showing is giddiness in the streets...

Be afraid, people...be very afraid...



Remember the 2008 Democratic National Convention when Senator McCain congratulated Senator Obama????


What happened during the Republican National Convention?



The day after Obama crying about McCain's "negative ads" this is running

By the way, Obama keeps claiming that McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time...the president of this country does not vote, Congress does...but, hey, what's one more lie



Ayers' office door is decorated with pictures of Mumia Abu-Jamal, Che Guevara and Malcolm X

Daniel Faulkner, murdered in cold blood by Mumia Abu-Jamal Mumia Abu-Jamal

Che Guevera pictures were hanging in Obama campaign offices

Bill Ayers office door celebrates criminals, communist terrorists

If anyone thinks that Bill Ayers is "repentant", think again...

Bill Ayers has simply gone underground...shockingly, he has held a position of influence among the most impressionable among us...our children!
So who exactly are Mumia Abu-Jamal, Che Guevara and Malcolm X?

On December 9, 1981, at approximately 3:55 a.m., Officer Danny Faulkner, a five year veteran of the Philadelphia Police Department, made a traffic stop at Locust Street near Twelfth Street. The car stopped by Officer Faulkner was being driven by William Cook. After making the stop, Danny called for assistance on his police radio and requested a police wagon to transport a prisoner. Unbeknownst to him, William Cook's brother, Wesley (aka Mumia Abu-Jamal) was across the street. As Danny attempted to handcuff William Cook, Mumia Abu-Jamal ran from across the street and shot the officer in the back. Danny turned and was able to fire one shot that struck Abu-Jamal in the chest; the wounded officer then fell to the pavement. Mumia Abu-Jamal stood over the downed officer and shot him four more times at close range, once directly in the face. Mumia Abu-Jamal was found still at the scene of the shooting by officers who arrived there within seconds. The murderer was slumped against the curb in front of his brother's car. In his possession was a .38 caliber revolver that records showed Mumia had purchased months earlier. The chamber of the gun had five spent cartridges. A cab driver, as well as other pedestrians, had witnessed the brutal slaying and identified Mumia Abu-Jamal as the killer both at the scene and during his trial. On July 2, 1982, after being tried before a jury of ten whites and two blacks, Mumia Abu-Jamal was convicted of murdering Officer Danny Faulkner. The next day, the jury sentenced him to death after deliberating for two hours. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania heard the defendant's appeals and upheld the conviction on March 6, 1989.

Officer Danny Faulkner joined the ranks of those courageous officers who have given their lives to keep our nation's streets safe and free. Danny and his wife, Maureen, had been married only slightly more than a year. Now, she was left a widow with only her memories of the young officer to comfort her and dreams of the life they could have shared together. Danny and Maureen Faulkner are the real victims of that horrible night in December, 1981. It is for them that we seek justice and the reason this site stands strong today. Please visit the many places on this site put together to help create awareness. Remember to spread the word.

Yes, liberals celebrate, defend and embrace murderers...Bill Ayers honors a murderer on his own door...Bill Ayers, the terrorist that has orchestrated murders of policemen...

Che Guevara was a terrorist and communist mass murder - another liberal "hero":

"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary...These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution! And a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate. We must create the pedagogy of the The Wall!" --Ernesto 'Che' Guevara

"The Wall" meaning the wall that Che Guevara so happily put people up against to shoot them.

But Che didn't always bother with the wall. One of his favored methods of killing was to tie his victim to a chair, gag him, walk around the room a bit ranting at him, and then slowly walk up, pistol in hand — and splatter the victim's brains and skull across the room while his companions watched.

Finally, Malcolm X (for those of you that have been living in an underground bunker all these years)...

All of us are black first, and everything else second.
Malcolm X,"God's angry men", WO, 31 May 1958 (FBI files 105-8999-788)

You show me a capitalist and I'll show you a bloodsucker.
Malcolm X, NYC, 20 Dec. 1964

These are some of the ones 'honored' on Bill Ayers door...
Any wonder why so many people have real concerns about Barack Obama and his friend Bill Ayers?



"Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, Kill your parents."

Lest we forget how passionate the REAL Bill Ayers is.

Born in 1944, Bill Ayers, along with his wife Bernardine Dohrn, was a 1960s leader of the homegrown terrorist group Weatherman, a Communist-driven splinter faction of Students for a Democratic Society. Characterizing Weatherman as "an American Red Army," Ayers summed up the organization's ideology as follows: "Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, Kill your parents."

More Ayers quotes:

"What a country," Ayers said in 2001. "It makes me want to puke."

Of the day he bombed the Pentagon, Ayers says, "Everything was absolutely ideal. ... The sky was blue. The birds were singing. And the bastards were finally going to get what was coming to them."

Ayers' comment on his life, as reported by Peter Collier and David Horowitz in their authoritative chapter on Weatherman in Destructive Generation, is this: "Guilty as sin, free as a bird, America is a great country."

Bill Ayers is a friend and admirer of Hugo Chavez. Ayers has traveled numerous times to Venezuela, extolling the virtues of revolution. Many liberal defenders of Ayers claim that he has redeemed himself through working in the field of education, but there is a very dark side to Ayers work there.

In 2006 during a visit to Venezuela, Ayers said: "We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution..."

Ayers and his wife, fellow Weatherman terrorist Bernardine Dohrn, raised the son of convicted fellow Weathermen Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert.

Michelle Malkin wrote in 2002: From both his biological and adoptive parents, Chesa Boudin has learned to stew in the indignant self-pity of Marxist leftovers

Boudin stands by the Weathermen's revolutionary agenda: "My parents were all dedicated to fighting U.S. imperialism around the world. I'm dedicated to the same thing."

This is the man that worked with Barack Obama on the Woods Fund board, funneling hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars, through government grants, to activist groups ACORN and AAAN (Arab American Action Network).

Bill Ayers is not someone that has 'reformed'. Bill Ayers continues his work today in different avenues. Ayers is influencing young people through his position as a university professor. Ayers, quite simply, has gone underground with his mission.

There is a common thread throughout all of this. Remember that Barack Obama's mother and grandparents were communist sympathizers. While living in Hawaii one of Barack Obama's mentors was another communist, Frank Davis Marshall. Obama stated in one of his books that he used to listen to Marshall's "poetry".

Spengler writes in Asia Times:

Barack Obama is a clever fellow who imbibed hatred of America with his mother's milk, but worked his way up the elite ladder of education and career. He shares the resentment of Muslims against the encroachment of American culture, although not their religion. He has the empathetic skill set of an anthropologist who lives with his subjects, learns their language, and elicits their hopes and fears while remaining at emotional distance. That is, he is the political equivalent of a sociopath. The difference is that he is practicing not on a primitive tribe but on the population of the United States.

America has the great misfortune to have encountered Obama at the peak of his powers at its worst moment of vulnerability in a generation. With malice aforethought, he has sought out their sore point.

Barack Obama's past is cloudy, intentionally so I believe.

Even the New York Times was unable to reveal much:

Barack Obama does not say much about his years in New York City. The time he spent as an undergraduate at Columbia College and then working in Manhattan in the early 1980s surfaces only fleetingly in his memoir. In the book, he casts himself as a solitary wanderer in the metropolis, the outsider searching for a way to “make myself of some use.”

Mr. Obama has, of course, done plenty of remembering. His 1995 memoir, “Dreams From My Father,” weighs in at more than 450 pages. But he also exercised his writer’s prerogative to decide what to include or leave out. Now, as he presents himself to voters, a look at his years in New York — other people’s accounts and his own — suggests not only what he was like back then but how he chooses to be seen now.

There still, only 28 days away from the 2008 election, do not know much about Barack Obama. There are still so many unanswered questions. There are still so many obvious problems, but with the help of the liberal main-stream-media, most of these continue to be shoved aside while accusations fly about Obama's opponent, John McCain.

A red herring, I say.

This is why I am extremely concerned about Barack Obama's association with Bill Ayers.

I think you should be concerned too.

We need to know who Barack Obama REALLY is. I think I do, do you?




He said it!

Obama was off teleprompter when he was talking to this man and said what we all know:





Oh! and just for the record, Obama STILL has on his website the following:

Diplomacy: Obama supports tough, direct presidential diplomacy with Iran without preconditions.

Just in case they take it down or change it, I have captured it here with today's date.



The relationship between Ayers and Obama is much more than just about an unrepentant terrorist. Somewhere in the rhetoric, I think this important fact is being overlooked.

OF COURSE it is important that William Ayers ploted to bomb the Pentagon and killed policemen, but the fact that Ayers and Barack Obama worked together to funnel Federal dollars to activist groups is much more damaging.

Obama and Ayers sat on the
Woods Foundation and gave thousands of dollars to ACORN and AAAN (Arab American Action Network) a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a "catastrophe" and supports intense immigration reform, including providing drivers licenses and education to illegal aliens.

Bill Ayers is friends with Hugo Chavez, he has been to Venezuela numerous times and Chavez speaks very highly of Ayers.

Hugo Chavez is someone that Barack Obama has said he would sit down and talk with WITHOUT preconditions.

Those are the first things that come to mind. THOSE are concerns that Americans have about Bill Ayers and Barack Obama.




Where have you heard those words lately?

Barack Obama, right?

Barack Obama has those words on his website

Barack Obama said those words in this audio clip on Super Tuesday

Barack Obama has said those words throughout this campaign...but those words are not Barack Obama's words...those words are from the New Party Principles

It is all over the internet now that Barack Obama was a New Party candidate in Illinois in 1996...

No Quarter reports: Barack Obama was an active participant in the 1990s, and a direct political beneficiary, of the Chicago New Party and, importantly, the Chicago DSA, a group of socialists affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America.

Part of the New Party Principles read:

Popular democratic organization should be encouraged and strengthened to make this peaceful revolution. Ordinary people can do extraordinary things if they are organized.

How interesting...

Barack Obama's carefully crafted past is starting to unravel...there are just too many questions that have gone unanswered...too many holes...too many inconsistencies...

Apparently Barack Obama 'forgot' to mention his ties to the Democratic Socialists of America...but that catchy phrase seems to have stuck in his head...you know, like a song that you just can't get out of your head...

Funny how little things like this always trip people up...it's always in the details...



What is this connection? What does it mean?

While looking at
Bill Ayers blog and making note of his ties to Hugo Chavez and Ayers’ promotion of ‘revolution education’...

A link from Ayers' page to one called "The Other Eye"...

One of the entries posted July 11, 2008 bemoans the fact that illegal youth are struggling with the fact that college will be difficult for them to get into. (FORGET the fact that a lot of LEGAL, taxpaying citizens have the same worries!!)

Then I noticed that the entry was written by some participants in “the 8 project, Chicago Illinois”

The 8 project…what is that?

Could it have something to do with the Chicago Eight?

I think it does...it shows the same mindset that we have been expressing concern about with Bill Ayers...why name a school project after antiwar activists?

The trial for eight antiwar activists charged with the responsibility for the violent demonstrations at the August 1968 Democratic National Convention opens in Chicago. The defendants included David Dellinger of the National Mobilization Committee (NMC); Rennie Davis and Thomas Hayden of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS); Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, founders of the Youth International Party ("Yippies"); Bobby Seale of the Black Panthers; and two lesser known activists, Lee Weiner and John Froines.

The group was charged with conspiracy to cross state lines with intent to incite a riot. All but Seale were represented by attorneys William Kunstler and Leonard Weinglass. The trial, presided over by Judge Julius Hoffman, turned into a circus as the defendants and their attorneys used the court as a platform to attack Nixon, the war, racisim, and oppression. Their tactics were so disruptive that at one point, Judge Hoffman ordered Seale gagged and strapped to his chair. When the trial ended in February 1970, Hoffman found the defendants and their attorneys guilty of 175 counts of contempt of court and sentenced them to terms between two to four years.

From the looks of it, the terrorists are still alive and well, living in our schools, teaching our children.

Bill Ayers and his associations play a much larger and more ominous role in who Barack Obama is.

The Ayers connection goes deeper and gets more troublesome the more we take a look at it, and I believe that we have only scratched the surface.


H/T American Thinker for the Hugo Chavez connection



From the website of Our Country Deserves Better PAC

We are a national effort focused on defeating Barack Obama's presidential campaign because Obama would be a disastrous president.

The Our Country Deserves Better committee is determined to tell the truth that is not being told by many in the media and among our national leaders: Barack Obama is an inexperienced, far-left, naive, "Blame America First" arrogant liberal, and that our country deserves better for our next President and Commander-in-Chief.

Our Country Deserves Better than Barack Obama - and
with your help we can ensure that Barack Obama is defeated on November 4th.

Patriotic rallies will be held across the nation Oct 15-29



...has been my focus lately...

been busy campaigning for the McCain / Palin ticket